Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18679390›Full record

ArticleNature clinical practice. Nephrology2008

Immunosuppression minimization protocols: how should they be monitored?

Enver Akalin

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature clinical practice. Nephrology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enver AkalinKidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Mount Sinai School of Medicine,New York, NY10029, USA. enver.akalin@mountsinai.org
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary discusses the experience of Shapiro et al. with renal allograft recipients at a single center who underwent significant minimization of immunosuppressive treatment with alemtuzumab induction and tacrolimus monotherapy (weaned to three times weekly by 1 year after transplantation). Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against human leukocyte antigen were monitored after transplantation in some patients. Although 44% of patients did not develop acute rejection or DSAs and had excellent 2-year graft survival (96%), spaced weaning was not attempted in 20% of patients, generally those with early rejection and poor allograft function. During tapering, 20% of patients developed acute rejection and 15% developed DSAs. Two-year graft survival was 63% in patients for whom weaning was not attempted and 78% in patients who experienced acute rejection. Alemtuzumab preconditioning with tacrolimus monotherapy and spaced weaning increased the risk of acute rejection and development of DSAs. Patients should be carefully selected for this protocol and monitored closely for DSAs. Results of a long-term controlled trial that includes protocol biopsies are required to reach more-definitive conclusions.

Identifiers

PMID18679390
OpenAlexW2024059994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.