Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2008
Impact of intensive PBSC mobilization therapy on outcomes following auto-SCT for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunochemotherapy with intensive consolidation for primary CNS lymphoma: a pilot study and prognostic assessment by diffusion-weighted MRI.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012Trial
- Immunochemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for untreated patients with mantle-cell lymphoma: CALGB 59909.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2009Trial
- The effect of the dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) regimen on stem cell mobilization and transplant outcomes of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who are candidates for up-front autologous stem cell transplantation.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2018Article
- The Challenge of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2016Review
- New approaches in primary central nervous system lymphoma.Chinese clinical oncology · 2015Review
- Progress in central nervous system lymphomas.British journal of haematology · 2014Review
- Reply to M.C. Chamberlain.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014Article
- How I treat CNS lymphomas.Blood · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The best method to mobilize PBSCs in patients with non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) is uncertain. We hypothesized that PBSC mobilization using an intensive chemotherapy regimen would improve outcomes after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in NHL patients at high risk for relapse. Fifty NHL patients were prospectively allocated to intense mobilization with high-dose etoposide plus either high-dose cytarabine or CY if they were 'high risk' for relapse, whereas 30 patients were allocated to nonintense mobilization with CY if they were 'standard risk' (all patients, +/-rituximab). All intensely mobilized patients were hospitalized compared with one-third of nonintensely mobilized patients. The EFS after ASCT was the same between the two groups, but overall survival (OS) was better for intensely mobilized patients (<0.01), including the diffuse large B-cell subgroup (P<0.04). We conclude that the intense mobilization of PBSCs in patients with NHL is more efficient than nonintense mobilization, but with greater toxicity. The equalization of EFS and superiority of OS in patients intensely mobilized to those nonintensely mobilized suggests that a treatment strategy using intensive chemotherapy for mobilization may be improving NHL outcomes after ASCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.