Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18678598›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2008

Transcript and in silico analysis of CLN3 in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis and associated mouse models.

Chun-Hung Chan, Hannah M Mitchison, David A Pearce

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phenotypic variant of CLN3 mutation.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cellular models of Batten disease.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. A tailored Cln3Scientific reports · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The CLN3 gene and protein: What we know.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. NCLs and ER: A stressful relationship.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Chun-Hung ChanCenter for Neural Development and Disease, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 645, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Hannah M Mitchison
David A Pearce
Institute of Developmental Physiology · RUUniversity College London · GB

Funding

The Autoimmune Response of Battens DiseaseR01NS044310 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PEARCE, DAVID A. · 2003 to 2011
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (JNCL), commonly known as Batten disease, is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder of childhood characterized by blindness, seizures, motor and cognitive decline, leading to death in early adulthood. Mutations within the CLN3 gene, which encodes a putative lysosomal protein of unknown function, are the underlying cause of JNCL. Over 85% of JNCL patients harbor a 1 kb deletion that is predicted to result in a truncated CLN3 protein and is presumed to be a null mutation. A recent study by Kitzmuller et al. (1) suggested that the 1 kb deletion-associated truncated protein may have partial function, and proposed that JNCL is a mutation-specific disease. In addition, the validity of the original and most widely utilized JNCL mouse model, the Cln3(Deltaex1-6) mouse, as a true null mutant was questioned. We report a substantial decrease in the transcript level of the truncated CLN3 gene product in cells from 1 kb deletion patients. We contend that the truncated CLN3 protein is unlikely to be expressed in JNCL patients since cellular quality control mechanisms at the RNA and protein levels are likely to degrade the mutant transcript and polypeptides. Moreover, we present analysis identifying the expressed transcripts present in Cln3(Deltaex1-6) mouse brain. From the analysis of expressed Cln3(Deltaex1-6) mouse transcripts, combined with in silico prediction of the expected consequences of the Cln3(Deltaex1-6) mutation on these transcripts, we argue that aberrant Cln3 proteins are unlikely to be expressed in this disease model. Taken together our results indicate that the most common mutation associated with JNCL results in a loss of functional CLN3, that the Cln3(Deltaex1-6) mouse harbors a null Cln3 allele, and that it therefore represents a valid model for this disease.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMice, KnockoutAllelesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceCell LineFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMolecular ChaperonesCLN3 protein, humanCLN3 protein, mouseMembrane GlycoproteinsMolecular ChaperonesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID18678598
PMCPMC2722895
OpenAlexW2133862798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.