ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2008
Virtual electrodes and the induction of fibrillation in Langendorff-perfused rabbit ventricles: the role of intracellular calcium.
Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The strength-interval curve in cardiac tissue.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013Review
- Intracellular calcium and the mechanism of anodal supernormal excitability in langendorff perfused rabbit ventricles.Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2011Article
- Upper limit of vulnerability and heterogeneity.Heart rhythm · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A strong premature electrical stimulus (S(2)) induces both virtual anodes and virtual cathodes. The effects of virtual electrodes on intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) transients and ventricular fibrillation thresholds (VFTs) are unclear. We studied 16 isolated, Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts with simultaneous voltage and [Ca(2+)](i) optical mapping and for vulnerable window determination. After baseline pacing (S(1)), a monophasic (10 ms anodal or cathodal) or biphasic (5 ms-5 ms) S(2) was applied to the left ventricular epicardium. Virtual electrode polarizations and [Ca(2+)](i) varied depending on the S(2) polarity. Relative to the level of [Ca(2+)](i) during the S(1) beat, the [Ca(2+)](i) level 40 ms after the onset of monophasic S(2) increased by 36+/-8% at virtual anodes and 20+/-5% at virtual cathodes (P<0.01), compared with 25+/-5% at both virtual cathode-anode and anode-cathode sites for biphasic S(2). The VFT was significantly higher and the vulnerable window significantly narrower for biphasic S(2) than for either anodal or cathodal S(2) (n=7, P<0.01). Treatment with thapsigargin and ryanodine (n=6) significantly prolonged the action potential duration compared with control (255+/-22 vs. 189+/-6 ms, P<0.05) and eliminated the difference in VFT between monophasic and biphasic S(2), although VFT was lower for both cases. We conclude that virtual anodes caused a greater increase in [Ca(2+)](i) than virtual cathodes. Monophasic S(2) is associated with lower VFT than biphasic S(2), but this difference was eliminated by the inhibition of the sarcoplasmic reticulum function and the prolongation of the action potential duration. However, the inhibition of the sarcoplasmic reticulum function also reduced VFT, indicating that the [Ca(2+)](i) dynamics modulate, but are not essential, to ventricular vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.