Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18676647›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2008

Hydrophobe-water interactions: methane as a model.

F Despa, R S Berry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Methane and Inflammation - A Review (Fight Fire with Fire).Intensive care medicine experimental · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F DespaDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California, Davis, California, USA. fdespa@ucdavis.edu
R S Berry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent molecular-dynamics simulations have demonstrated that the use of an empirical hydrophobic potential displaying two minima, i.e., one for hydrophobes in close contact and one for hydrophobes separated by a hydration layer, leads to a marked improvement in protein structure prediction. This potential is supported by experimental data and simulations, but its physical origin and mathematical formulation have not been derived as yet. Here we show that water-mediated attraction (the "wetting regime") between two hydrophobic molecules originates in the interaction between the dipoles induced at the surface of the hydrophobes by the surrounding structured water. As an example, we derive the effective hydrophobic potential that describes the interaction between two methane molecules, a classical model of a double-well energy function. We found an excellent agreement with published results from all-atom, explicit solvent molecular-dynamics simulations of this interaction. The approach presented here provides the theoretical basis for implementing an adequate representation of the wetting regime of the hydrophobic interactions in force fields used for structure prediction. The results are useful for modeling both protein folding and binding.

Indexed as

Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsModels, ChemicalMethaneProtein BindingProtein FoldingWaterMethaneWater

Identifiers

PMID18676647
PMCPMC2567944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.