Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18675380›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2009

Classification models for the prediction of clinicians' information needs.

Guilherme Del Fiol, Peter J Haug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Practical choices for infobutton customization: experience from four sites.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Active learning for clinical text classification: is it better than random sampling?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guilherme Del FiolBiomedical Informatics Department, University of Utah, 4646 Lake Park Boulevard, Salt Lake City, UT 84120, USA. guilherme.delfiol@utah.edu
Peter J Haug

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH MEDICAL INFORMATICS TRAININGT15LM007124 · NLM · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Karen Louise Eilbeck · 1997 to 2026
$22.0M
Infobuttons to Improve Information Access in Order EntryR01LM007593 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CIMINO, JAMES J. · 2002 to 2007
$2.4M
NLM NIH HHS 1T15LM007124-10NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007593NLM NIH HHS R01-LM07593NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinicians face numerous information needs during patient care activities and most of these needs are not met. Infobuttons are information retrieval tools that help clinicians to fulfill their information needs by providing links to on-line health information resources from within an electronic medical record (EMR) system. The aim of this study was to produce classification models based on medication infobutton usage data to predict the medication-related content topics (e.g., dose, adverse effects, drug interactions, patient education) that a clinician is most likely to choose while entering medication orders in a particular clinical context.

designWe prepared a dataset with 3078 infobutton sessions and 26 attributes describing characteristics of the user, the medication, and the patient. In these sessions, users selected one out of eight content topics. Automatic attribute selection methods were then applied to the dataset to eliminate redundant and useless attributes. The reduced dataset was used to produce nine classification models from a set of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. Finally, the performance of the models was measured and compared. MEASUREMENTS: Area under the ROC curve (AUC) and agreement (kappa) between the content topics predicted by the models and those chosen by clinicians in each infobutton session.

resultsThe performance of the models ranged from 0.49 to 0.56 (kappa). The AUC of the best model ranged from 0.73 to 0.99. The best performance was achieved when predicting choice of the adult dose, pediatric dose, patient education, and pregnancy category content topics.

conclusionThe results suggest that classification models based on infobutton usage data are a promising method for the prediction of content topics that a clinician would choose to answer patient care questions while using an EMR system.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalModels, StatisticalOnline SystemsAlgorithmsArea Under CurveArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremDatabases, FactualHealth PersonnelHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPatient CarePharmaceutical PreparationsPrescriptionsROC CurvePharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID18675380
PMCPMC2680072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.