Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18674560›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2008

A statistical method for quantifying songbird phonology and syntax.

Wei Wu, John A Thompson, Richard Bertram, Frank Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Corticobasal ganglia projecting neurons are required for juvenile vocal learning but not for adult vocal plasticity in songbirds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Audition-independent vocal crystallization associated with intrinsic developmental gene expression dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  6. Independent premotor encoding of the sequence and structure of birdsong in avian cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. HTR2 receptors in a songbird premotor cortical-like area modulate spectral characteristics of zebra finch song.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Axial organization of a brain region that sequences a learned pattern of behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  11. Dual pre-motor contribution to songbird syllable variation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei WuDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4330, USA. wwu@stat.fsu.edu
John A Thompson
Richard Bertram
Frank Johnson

Funding

CELL SURVIVAL IN A NEURAL CIRCUIT FOR LEARNINGR01DC002035 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BERTRAM, RICHARD, JOHNSON, JAMES FRANK · 1995 to 2010
$1.6M
Neural dynamics of vocal recoveryF31DC008028 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, JOHN A · 2006 to 2008
$84k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC 008028NIDCD NIH HHS DC 02035NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC008028NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Songbirds are the preeminent animal model for understanding how the brain encodes and produces learned vocalizations. Here, we report a new statistical method, the Kullback-Leibler (K-L) distance, for analyzing vocal change over time. First, we use a computerized recording system to capture all song syllables produced by birds each day. Sound Analysis Pro software [Tchernichovski O, Nottebohm F, Ho CE, Pesaran B, Mitra PP. A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. Anim Behav 2000;59:1167-76] is then used to measure the duration of each syllable as well as four spectral features: pitch, entropy, frequency modulation, and pitch goodness. Next, two-dimensional scatter plots of each day of singing are created where syllable duration is on the x-axis and each of the spectral features is represented separately on the y-axis. Each point in the scatter plots represents one syllable and we regard these plots as random samples from a probability distribution. We then apply the standard information-theoretic quantity K-L distance to measure dissimilarity in phonology across days of singing. A variant of this procedure can also be used to analyze differences in syllable syntax.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAcousticsAlgorithmsAnimalsDenervationEthologyFemaleFinchesHigh Vocal CenterMaleNeurophysiologySpeech AcousticsVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID18674560
PMCPMC2569874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.