Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18674559›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2008

Evaluation of neurite outgrowth anisotropy using a novel application of circular analysis.

Grace NgaYin Li, Diane Hoffman-Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sequential Retraction Segregates SGN Processes during Target Selection in the Cochlea.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantifying cellular alignment on anisotropic biomaterial platforms.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2014
    Article
  8. Topography, cell response, and nerve regeneration.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2010
    Review
  9. Neurite outgrowth at the biomimetic interface.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grace NgaYin LiDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biotechnology and Center for Biomedical Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Diane Hoffman-Kim

Funding

Quantifying Axon Growth in Complex EnvironmentsR01EB005722 · NIBIB · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI HOFFMAN-KIM, DIANE · 2007 to 2010
$1.3M
Composite Biomaterials for Neurite OutgrowthR21EB004506 · NIBIB · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI HOFFMAN-KIM, DIANE · 2006 to 2007
$417k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005722NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005722-01NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB004506NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB004506-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise axon growth is required for making proper connections in development and after injury. One method of studying axon guidance and growth is through in vitro outgrowth assays that present controlled microenvironments. In this study, we applied circular statistical methods to evaluate directional neurite response. Visualization of data on a circular scale allows more accurate representation of the data, as neurite angles are inherently expressed on a circle. Here, the direction of neurite outgrowth from dorsal root ganglia derived neurons on different substrate types was quantitatively measured. Further, simulations of datasets with known circular parameters reflecting expected neurite angle distributions from different substrate types were also generated. Circular statistical methods were utilized and compared to linear statistical models widely used in the neuroscience literature. For small samples, Rao's spacing test showed the smallest occurrence of Type I errors (false positives) when tested against simulated uniform distributions. V-test and Rayleigh's test showed highest statistical power when tested against a unimodal distribution with known and unknown mean direction, respectively. For bimodal samples, Watson's U(2)-test showed the highest statistical power. Overall, circular statistical uniformity tests showed higher statistical power than linear non-parametric tests, particularly for small samples (n=5). Circular analysis methods represent a useful tool for evaluation of directionality of neurite outgrowth with applications including: (1) assessment of neurite outgrowth potential; (2) determination of isotropy of cellular responses to single and multiple cues and (3) determination of the relative strengths of cues present in a complex environment.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAnimalsAnisotropyCells, CulturedGanglia, SpinalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastNerve RegenerationNeuritesRats

Identifiers

PMID18674559
PMCPMC2587349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.