Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18673565›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2008

Sequence conservation and combinatorial complexity of Drosophila neural precursor cell enhancers.

Thomas Brody, Wayne Rasband, Kevin Baler, Alexander Kuzin, Mukta Kundu, Ward F Odenwald

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural precursor-specific expression of multiple Drosophila genes is driven by dual enhancer modules with overlapping function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of a Drosophila genome-wide conserved sequence database to identify functionally related cis-regulatory enhancers.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2012
    Article
  5. Transcriptional regulatory regions of gap43 needed in developing and regenerating retinal ganglion cells.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas BrodyNeural Cell-Fate Determinants Section, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. brodyt@ninds.nih.gov
Wayne Rasband
Kevin Baler
Alexander Kuzin
Mukta Kundu
Ward F Odenwald

Funding

Analysis of Neural Precursor Cell cis-Regulatory EnhancersZIANS002820 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 2010 to 2017
$5.3M
Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling CNS DevelopmentZ01NS002820 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 1990 to 2008
$2.5M
Analysis Of Gene Expression Regulatory Networks Controlling CNS DevelopmentZIHNS002820 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 2009 to 2009
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of highly conserved sequences within cis-regulatory regions can serve as a valuable starting point for elucidating the basis of enhancer function. This study focuses on regulation of gene expression during the early events of Drosophila neural development. We describe the use of EvoPrinter and cis-Decoder, a suite of interrelated phylogenetic footprinting and alignment programs, to characterize highly conserved sequences that are shared among co-regulating enhancers.

resultsAnalysis of in vivo characterized enhancers that drive neural precursor gene expression has revealed that they contain clusters of highly conserved sequence blocks (CSBs) made up of shorter shared sequence elements which are present in different combinations and orientations within the different co-regulating enhancers; these elements contain either known consensus transcription factor binding sites or consist of novel sequences that have not been functionally characterized. The CSBs of co-regulated enhancers share a large number of sequence elements, suggesting that a diverse repertoire of transcription factors may interact in a highly combinatorial fashion to coordinately regulate gene expression. We have used information gained from our comparative analysis to discover an enhancer that directs expression of the nervy gene in neural precursor cells of the CNS and PNS.

conclusionThe combined use EvoPrinter and cis-Decoder has yielded important insights into the combinatorial appearance of fundamental sequence elements required for neural enhancer function. Each of the 30 enhancers examined conformed to a pattern of highly conserved blocks of sequences containing shared constituent elements. These data establish a basis for further analysis and understanding of neural enhancer function.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceEnhancer Elements, GeneticNeuronsSoftwareAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsBase SequenceComputational BiologyDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene LibraryGenes, InsectSequence AlignmentStem CellsTranscription FactorsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingDrosophila Proteinsnvy protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18673565
PMCPMC2529316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.