Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18671836›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2008

Nebulised heparin: a new approach to the treatment of acute lung injury?

Peter M Suter

Open access · goldAbstract readCommentEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter M Suter
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The administration of heparin by nebulisation has been proposed for the 'local' treatment of pulmonary coagulation disturbances in acute lung injury (ALI). Alveolar and lung micro-vascular fibrin accumulation and breakdown inhibition indeed play a central role in the development and clinical course of this disease. Preclinical studies provide some evidence of the beneficial effects of heparin inhalation in several animal models of ALI. Clinical investigations are sparse, and trials such as the one presented by Dixon and colleagues in a recent issue of Critical Care are welcome as they provide insight into the possible clinical use of nebulised heparin in this situation. This phase 1 trial involved 16 patients with early ALI, and showed the feasibility of the approach. In addition, non-significant changes in respiratory functions and systemic anticoagulant effects were documented with the four doses tested. The study of Dixon and colleagues adds to data that helps pave the way towards a possible clinical use of heparin by nebulisation in ALI. It remains to be clarified in which clinical situations, at what time points and with which dosages the best chances exist for a beneficial effect on the prognosis of these patients.

Indexed as

Acute Lung InjuryHeparinHumansNebulizers and VaporizersTreatment OutcomeHeparin

Identifiers

PMID18671836
PMCPMC2575564
OpenAlexW2124015468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.