Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18670894›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular histology2008

Genomic instability in blood cells is able to predict the oral cancer risk: an experimental study in rats.

Daniel A Ribeiro, Daniela G Grilli, Daisy M F Salvadori

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular histology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel A RibeiroDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of Sao Paulo, UNIFESP, Av. Ana Costa, 95, Vila Mathias, Santos, SP, 11060-001, Brazil. daribeiro@unifesp.br
Daniela G Grilli
Daisy M F Salvadori
Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was undertaken to investigate the genomic instability on blood cells during 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4NQO)-induced rat tongue carcinogenesis by means of single cell gel (comet) and micronucleus assays. Male Wistar rats were distributed into three groups of 10 animals each and treated with 50 ppm 4NQO solution through their drinking water for 4, 12, and 20 weeks. Ten animals were used as negative control. Although no histopathological abnormalities were induced in the epithelium after 4 weeks of carcinogen exposure, genetic damage was found in blood cells as depicted by the mean tail moment and an increase of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes. After 12 and 20 weeks treatment, the same picture occurred, being the strong effect observed in the micronucleus induction. These periods correspond to pre-neoplastic lesions and well-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas, respectively. Taken together, our results support the idea that genomic instability on blood cells appears to be associated with the risk and progression of oral cancer, being a reliable tool for detecting early systemic conditions of malignancy.

Indexed as

Comet Assay4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxideAnimalsCarcinogensErythroblastsErythrocytes, AbnormalGenomic InstabilityMaleMicronuclei, Chromosome-DefectivePredictive Value of TestsRatsRats, WistarTime FactorsTongue Neoplasms4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxideCarcinogens

Identifiers

PMID18670894
OpenAlexW2081008665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.