Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18668318›Full record

ReviewSurgery today2008

Primary small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast: report of a case.

Satoki Kinoshita, Akio Hirano, Kazumasa Komine, Susumu Kobayashi, Shigeya Kyoda, Hiroshi Takeyama, Ken Uchida, Toshiaki Morikawa, Jison Nagase, Goi Sakamoto

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgery today, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of breast: a rare case vignette.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A rare case of primary infiltrating neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast.Iranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society · 2012
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast.Journal of the Korean Surgical Society · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Satoki KinoshitaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, 163-1 Kashiwashita, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8567, Japan.
Akio Hirano
Kazumasa Komine
Susumu Kobayashi
Shigeya Kyoda
Hiroshi Takeyama
Ken Uchida
Toshiaki Morikawa
Jison Nagase
Goi Sakamoto
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPJikei University Kashiwa hospital · JPNagase (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast is a rare and aggressive neoplasm without an established treatment protocol because so few cases have been described. We report a case of primary small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in a 31-year-old woman. The patient came to our hospital 10 days after consulting another clinic, where a diagnosis of locally advanced breast cancer suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy had been made. Core needle biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance revealed invasive carcinoma. The doubling time of the tumor progression was calculated as 12 days based on ultrasonographic measurement. After three cycles of chemotherapeutic regimens consisting of adriamycin plus docetaxel, the disease was judged to be progressive and the patient underwent surgery. Definitive histopathological examination revealed primary small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Local and mediastinal recurrence with multiple liver metastases developed only 5 weeks after surgery. Cisplatin plus irinotecan combination chemotherapy was started; however, the patient died of aggressive recurrent tumor progression 6 months after surgery, in spite of the transient tumor regression achieved by chemotherapy. This case reinforces the importance of an early correct diagnosis and the standardization of a treatment regimen for this very rare tumor.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsy, NeedleBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineCarcinoma, Small CellDiagnosis, DifferentialFatal OutcomeFemaleHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessUltrasonography, Mammary

Identifiers

PMID18668318
OpenAlexW1975814954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.