Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18667439›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2008

Synonymous and nonsynonymous polymorphisms versus divergences in bacterial genomes.

Austin L Hughes, Robert Friedman, Pierre Rivailler, Jeffrey O French

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Endosymbiont evolution: predictions from theory and surprises from genomes.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Austin L HughesDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, USA.
Robert Friedman
Pierre Rivailler
Jeffrey O French

Funding

POLYMORPHISM &EVOLUTION OF MHC GENESR01GM043940 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HUGHES, AUSTIN L. · 1990 to 2010
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM43940NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparison of the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphisms within species with the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions between species has been widely used as a supposed indicator of positive Darwinian selection, with the ratio of these 2 ratios being designated as a neutrality index (NI). Comparison of genome-wide polymorphism within 12 species of bacteria with divergence from an outgroup species showed substantial differences in NI among taxa. A low level of nonsynonymous polymorphism at a locus was the best predictor of NI < 1, rather than a high level of nonsynonymous substitution between species. Moreover, genes with NI < 1 showed a strong tendency toward the occurrence of rare nonsynonymous polymorphisms, as expected under the action of ongoing purifying selection. Thus, our results are more consistent with the hypothesis that a high relative rate of between-species nonsynonymous substitution reflects mainly the action of purifying selection within species to eliminate slightly deleterious mutations rather than positive selection between species. This conclusion is consistent with previous results highlighting an important role of slightly deleterious variants in bacterial evolution and suggests caution in the use of the McDonald-Kreitman test and related statistics as tests of positive selection.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialPolymorphism, GeneticCodonEvolution, MolecularGenes, BacterialGenetic VariationModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalNucleosidesOligonucleotidesRecombination, GeneticSelection, GeneticSpecies SpecificityCodonNucleosidesOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID18667439
PMCPMC2734133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.