Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18665793›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2008

Bioactive nanofibers instruct cells to proliferate and differentiate during enamel regeneration.

Zhan Huang, Timothy D Sargeant, James F Hulvat, Alvaro Mata, Pablo Bringas, Chung-Yan Koh, Samuel I Stupp, Malcolm L Snead

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Minimal amelogenin domain for enamel formation.JOM (Warrendale, Pa. : 1989) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Nanomaterials Application in Orthodontics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Design of materials with supramolecular polymers.Progress in polymer science · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. AnFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Enamel biomimetics-fiction or future of dentistry.International journal of oral science · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nanomaterials for Tissue Engineering In Dentistry.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  18. Rational design of fiber forming supramolecular structures.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2016
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhan HuangThe Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Timothy D Sargeant
James F Hulvat
Alvaro Mata
Pablo Bringas
Chung-Yan Koh
Samuel I Stupp
Malcolm L Snead
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Nanotechnology Strategies for Growth of Bones and TeethR01DE015920 · NIDCR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SNEAD, MALCOLM L., STUPP, SAMUEL I · 2005 to 2015
$5.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE015920NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During tooth development, ectoderm-derived ameloblast cells create enamel by synthesizing a complex protein mixture serving to control cell to matrix interactions and the habit of hydroxyapatite crystallites. Using an in vitro cell and organ culture system, we studied the effect of artificial bioactive nanostructures on ameloblasts with the long-term goal of developing cell-based strategies for tooth regeneration. We used branched peptide amphiphile molecules containing the peptide motif Arg-Gly-Asp, or "RGD" (abbreviated BRGD-PA), known to self-assemble in physiologic environments into nanofibers that display on their surfaces high densities of this biological signal. Ameloblast-like cells (line LS8) and primary enamel organ epithelial (EOE) cells were cultured within PA hydrogels, and the PA was injected into the enamel organ epithelia of mouse embryonic incisors. The expression of amelogenin, ameloblastin, integrin alpha 5, and integrin alpha 6 was detected by quantitative real-time PCR and immunodetection techniques. We performed cell proliferation assay using BrdU labeling and a biomineralization assay using Alizarin red S staining with quantitative Ca(2+) measurements. In the cell culture model, ameloblast-like cells (LS8) and primary EOE cells responded to the BRGD-PA nanostructures with enhanced proliferation and greater amelogenin, ameloblastin, and integrin expression levels. At the site of injection of the BRGD-PA in the organ culture model, we observed EOE cell proliferation with differentiation into ameloblasts as evidenced by their expression of enamel specific proteins. Ultrastructural analysis showed the nanofibers within the forming extracellular matrix, in contact with the EOE cells engaged in enamel formation and regeneration. This study shows that BRGD-PA nanofibers present with enamel proteins participate in integrin-mediated cell binding to the matrix with delivery of instructive signals for enamel formation.

Indexed as

RegenerationAmeloblastsAmelogeninAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell ProliferationCells, CulturedDental EnamelIncisorIntegrinsMiceNanoparticlesNanostructuresNanotechnologyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAmelogeninBiocompatible MaterialsIntegrins

Identifiers

PMID18665793
PMCPMC2686923
OpenAlexW1999531315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.