Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18665188›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2008

Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction.

D Puliti, G Miccinesi, N Collina, V De Lisi, M Federico, S Ferretti, A C Finarelli, F Foca, L Mangone, C Naldoni and 9 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence and risk factors of MRONJ in breast cancer patients with CTIBL.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The potential of breast cancer screening in Europe.International journal of cancer · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

D PulitiClinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, CSPO, Research Institute of the Tuscany Region, via San Salvi 12, Florence 50135, Italy.
G Miccinesi
N Collina
V De Lisi
M Federico
S Ferretti
A C Finarelli
F Foca
L Mangone
C Naldoni
M Petrella
A Ponti
N Segnan
A Sigona
M Zarcone
M Zorzi
M Zappa
E Paci
IMPACT Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was the evaluation of the impact of service screening programmes on breast cancer mortality in five regions of Italy. We conducted a matched case-control study with four controls for each case. Cases were defined as breast cancer deaths occurred not later than 31 December 2002. Controls were sampled from the local municipality list and matched by date of birth. Screening histories were assessed by the local, computerised, screening database and subjects were classified as either invited or not-yet-invited and as either screened or unscreened. There were a total of 1750 breast cancer deaths within the 50 to 74-year-old breast cancer cases and a total of 7000 controls. The logistic conditional estimate of the cumulative odds ratios comparing invited with not-yet-invited women was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.62-0.92). Restricting the analyses to invited women, the odds ratio of screened to never-respondent women corrected for self-selection bias was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.36-0.85). The introduction of breast cancer screening programmes in Italy is associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality attributable to the additional impact of service screening over and above the background access to mammography.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansItalyLogistic ModelsMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID18665188
PMCPMC2527797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.