Trial reportSpine2008
A randomized placebo-controlled trial of single-dose IM corticosteroid for radicular low back pain.
Trial report in Spine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non-radicular low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Drugs for relief of pain in patients with sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2012Pooled it
- A comparative study on the efficacy of dexketoprofen and methylprednisolone in the treatment of acute low back pain.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Trial
- Efficacy of intramuscular glucocorticoid injection in patients with lumbar radicular pain: a randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Trial
- Steroids and L-Lysine Aescinate for Acute Radiculopathy Due to a Herniated Lumbar Disk.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Trial
- Diazepam Is No Better Than Placebo When Added to Naproxen for Acute Low Back Pain.Annals of emergency medicine · 2017Trial
- Oral steroids for acute radiculopathy due to a herniated lumbar disk: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA · 2015Trial
- Effectiveness of Pulse Intravenous Infusion of Methylprednisolone on Pain in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2024Article
- An Updated Overview of Low Back Pain Management.Asian spine journal · 2022Article
- Intravenous Corticosteroid Therapy for Acute Lumbar Radicular Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Neuropathic Pain Related with Spinal Disorders: A Systematic Review.Asian spine journal · 2017Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with radicular low back pain who present to an emergency department (ED) within 1 week of pain onset.
objectiveWe hypothesized that a single intramuscular 160 mg dose of methylprednisolone acetate would improve pain and functional outcomes 1 month after ED discharge if the corticosteroid were administered early in disease symptomotology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Parenteral corticosteroids are not recommended for acute, radicular low back pain, though their role in this disease process is ill-defined. To date, this medication class has only been studied in a highly selected group of patients requiring hospitalization. METHODS.: Adults between the ages of 21 and 50 who presented to an ED with low back pain and a positive straight leg raise test were enrolled. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity on an 11 point numerical rating scale 1 month after ED visit. Secondary outcomes 1 month after ED discharge included analgesic use, functional disability, and adverse medication effects.
resultsSix hundred thirty-seven patients were approached for participation, 133 were eligible, and 82 were randomized. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The primary outcome, a comparison of the mean improvement in pain intensity, favored methylprednisolone by 1.3 (P = 0.10). Some secondary outcomes favored methylprednisolone, such as use of analgesic medication within the previous 24 hours (22% vs. 43%, 95% CI for difference of 20%: 0%-40%) and functional disability (19% vs. 49%, 95% CI for difference of 29%: 9%-49%). Adverse medication effects 1 week after ED discharge were reported by 32% of methylprednisolone and 24% of placebo patients (95% CI for difference of 9%: -12% to 30%).
conclusionThis study was a negative study, though there was a suggestion of benefit of methylprednisolone acetate in a population of young adults with acute radicular low back pain. Further work with a larger sample of patients is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.