Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18664581›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Organ renewal and cell divisions by differentiated cells in Drosophila.

Arjun Guha, Li Lin, Thomas B Kornberg

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Receptor tyrosine kinases in Drosophila development.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Branching morphogenesis: from cells to organs and back.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arjun GuhaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Li Lin
Thomas B Kornberg
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many organs, the processes of renewal and regeneration recruit stem cells to replace differentiated, postmitotic cells, but the capacity of an organ's differentiated cells to divide and contribute is uncertain. Most cells of the Drosophila adult are the descendants of dedicated precursors that divide and replace larval cells that are histolyzed during metamorphosis. We investigated the provenance of cells that reconstitute the second thoracic metamere of the tracheal system (Tr2). These cells contribute the precursors for Branchless(FGF)-dependent growth of the dorsal air sacs, the major tracheal organs of the adult fly. We found that, in contrast to the cells in other tracheal metameres that proceed through many cycles of endoreplication, the cells that constitute the Tr2 branches in young larvae do not. Like the cells in other tracheal metameres, these cells arrest mitotic cycling in the embryo and form differentiated, air-filled tracheal branches of the larva. We report here that they reinitiate cell divisions during the third instar (L3) to increase the Tr2 population by approximately 10-fold with multipotent cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell DifferentiationCell DivisionDrosophilaIn Situ Nick-End LabelingRegenerationRespiratory System

Identifiers

PMID18664581
PMCPMC2504775
OpenAlexW2142571210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.