Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18664280›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2008

Cost-effectiveness of introducing a rotavirus vaccine in developing countries: the case of Mexico.

Atanacio Valencia-Mendoza, Stefano M Bertozzi, Juan-Pablo Gutierrez, Robbin Itzler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review of the economic value of diarrheal vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Access and barriers to immunization in West Bengal, India: quality matters.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2013
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Atanacio Valencia-MendozaDivision of Health Economics, National Institute of Public Health, Av Universidad No 655, Col Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62508, México. avalencia@correo.insp.mx
Stefano M Bertozzi
Juan-Pablo Gutierrez
Robbin Itzler
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas · MXInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USNational Institute of Public Health · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn developing countries rotavirus is the leading cause of severe diarrhoea and diarrhoeal deaths in children under 5. Vaccination could greatly alleviate that burden, but in Mexico as in most low- and middle-income countries the decision to add rotavirus vaccine to the national immunisation program will depend heavily on its cost-effectiveness and affordability. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of including the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in Mexico's national immunisation program.

methodsA cost-effectiveness model was developed from the perspective of the health system, modelling the vaccination of a hypothetical birth cohort of 2 million children monitored from birth through 60 months of age. It compares the cost and disease burden of rotavirus in an unvaccinated cohort of children with one vaccinated as recommended at 2, 4, and 6 months.

resultsIncluding the pentavalent vaccine in the national immunisation program could prevent 71,464 medical visits (59%), 5,040 hospital admissions (66%), and 612 deaths from rotavirus gastroenteritis (70%). At US$10 per dose and a cost of administration of US$13.70 per 3-dose regimen, vaccination would cost US$122,058 per death prevented, US$4,383 per discounted life-year saved, at a total net cost of US$74.7 million dollars to the health care system. Key variables influencing the results were, in order of importance, case fatality, vaccine price, vaccine efficacy, serotype prevalence, and annual loss of efficacy. The results are also very sensitive to the discount rate assumed when calculated per life-year saved.

conclusionAt prices below US $15 per dose, the cost per life-year saved is estimated to be lower than one GNP per capita and hence highly cost effective by the WHO Commission on Macroeconomics and Health criteria. The cost-effectiveness estimates are highly dependent upon the mortality in the absence of the vaccine, which suggests that the vaccine is likely to be significantly more cost-effective among poorer populations and among those with less access to prompt medical care - such that poverty reduction programs would be expected to reduce the future cost-effectiveness of the vaccine.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisDeveloping CountriesDiarrheaHealth Care CostsHealth PrioritiesHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantMexicoModels, EconomicNational Health ProgramsRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesRotavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID18664280
PMCPMC2527317
OpenAlexW2060271581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.