Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18663132›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2008

Ni2+ block of CaV3.1 (alpha1G) T-type calcium channels.

Carlos A Obejero-Paz, I Patrick Gray, Stephen W Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional Postnatal Maturation of the Medial Olivocochlear Efferent-Outer Hair Cell Synapse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolutionary insights into T-type CaThe Journal of general physiology · 2017
    Article
  9. Models of calcium permeation through T-type channels.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2014
    Review
  10. Complex modulation of Ca(v)3.1 T-type calcium channel by nickel.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlos A Obejero-PazDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
I Patrick Gray
Stephen W Jones

Funding

SPEECH AS A SELF-ORGANIZED COOPERATIVE PROCESSR29NS024771 · NINDS · FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY · PI TULLER, BETTY K · 1988 to 1988
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS24771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ni(2+) inhibits current through calcium channels, in part by blocking the pore, but Ni(2+) may also allosterically affect channel activity via sites outside the permeation pathway. As a test for pore blockade, we examined whether the effect of Ni(2+) on Ca(V)3.1 is affected by permeant ions. We find two components to block by Ni(2+), a rapid block with little voltage dependence, and a slow block most visible as accelerated tail currents. Rapid block is weaker for outward vs. inward currents (apparent K(d) = 3 vs. 1 mM Ni(2+), with 2 mM Ca(2+) or Ba(2+)) and is reduced at high permeant ion concentration (110 vs. 2 mM Ca(2+) or Ba(2+)). Slow block depends both on the concentration and on the identity of the permeant ion (Ca(2+) vs. Ba(2+) vs. Na(+)). Slow block is 2-3x faster in Ba(2+) than in Ca(2+) (2 or 110 mM), and is approximately 10x faster with 2 vs. 110 mM Ca(2+) or Ba(2+). Slow block is orders of magnitude slower than the diffusion limit, except in the nominal absence of divalent cations ( approximately 3 muM Ca(2+)). We conclude that both fast and slow block of Ca(V)3.1 by Ni(2+) are most consistent with occlusion of the pore. The exit rate of Ni(2+) for slow block is reduced at high Ni(2+) concentrations, suggesting that the site responsible for fast block can "lock in" slow block by Ni(2+), at a site located deeper within the pore. In contrast to the complex pore block observed for Ca(V)3.1, inhibition of Ca(V)3.2 by Ni(2+) was essentially independent of voltage, and was similar in 2 mM Ca(2+) vs. Ba(2+), consistent with inhibition by a different mechanism, at a site outside the pore.

Indexed as

BariumCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels, T-TypeCell LineDose-Response Relationship, DrugEpithelial CellsHumansIon Channel GatingMembrane PotentialsNickelBariumCACNA1G protein, humanCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channels, T-TypeNickel

Identifiers

PMID18663132
PMCPMC2483332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.