Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18663020›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2008

Comparative in vitro activities of the investigational fluoroquinolone DC-159a and other antimicrobial agents against human mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas.

Ken B Waites, Donna M Crabb, Lynn B Duffy

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. BMJ case reports · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Mycoplasma genitalium: should we treat and how?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2011
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ken B WaitesDepartment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA. waites@path.uab.edu
Donna M Crabb
Lynn B Duffy
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vitro susceptibilities of 151 unique clinical isolates of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma fermentans, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Ureaplasma species to DC-159a, an investigational fluoroquinolone, in comparison with those to other agents were determined. Macrolides were the most active agents against M. pneumoniae and M. genitalium, whereas clindamycin was most active against M. hominis. DC-159a MICs were <or=0.5 microg/ml for all Mycoplasma species and <or=4 microg/ml for ureaplasmas. DC-159a was the most active fluoroquinolone tested against M. pneumoniae and M. fermentans, and it was second to moxifloxacin against the other species. It was bactericidal against 10 M. pneumoniae isolates and demonstrated killing of >or=99.9% of the inoculum at 24 h for 2 isolates. The excellent in vitro activity of DC-159a demonstrates its potential for use in the treatment of infections due to mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas.

Indexed as

AminopyridinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycoplasmaMycoplasma fermentansMycoplasma genitaliumMycoplasma hominisMycoplasma InfectionsMycoplasma pneumoniaeUreaplasmaUreaplasma Infections7-(7-amino-7-methyl-5-azaspiro(2.4)heptan-5-yl)-6-fluoro-1-(2-fluoro-1-cyclopropyl)-1,4-dihydro-8-methoxy-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidAminopyridinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID18663020
PMCPMC2565903
OpenAlexW2120736200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.