Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18662996›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2008

The DNA replication checkpoint directly regulates MBF-dependent G1/S transcription.

Chaitali Dutta, Prasanta K Patel, Adam Rosebrock, Anna Oliva, Janet Leatherwood, Nicholas Rhind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TheBiomolecules · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. RecQ DNA Helicase Rqh1 Promotes Rad3Molecular and cellular biology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Identification of S-phase DNA damage-response targets in fission yeast reveals conservation of damage-response networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chaitali DuttaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Prasanta K Patel
Adam Rosebrock
Anna Oliva
Janet Leatherwood
Nicholas Rhind
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USState University of New York · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

The Role of MRN in the S-Phase DNA Damage CheckpointR01GM069957 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI RHIND, NICHOLAS R · 2004 to 2013
$2.8M
Transcription circuitry of the S. pombe cell cycleR01GM076272 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI LEATHERWOOD, JANET K · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P40RR01632004NIGMS NIH HHS GM069957NIGMS NIH HHS GM076272NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069957NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA replication checkpoint transcriptionally upregulates genes that allow cells to adapt to and survive replication stress. Our results show that, in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the replication checkpoint regulates the entire G(1)/S transcriptional program by directly regulating MBF, the G(1)/S transcription factor. Instead of initiating a checkpoint-specific transcriptional program, the replication checkpoint targets MBF to maintain the normal G(1)/S transcriptional program during replication stress. We propose a mechanism for this regulation, based on in vitro phosphorylation of the Cdc10 subunit of MBF by the Cds1 replication-checkpoint kinase. Replacement of two potential phosphorylation sites with phosphomimetic amino acids suffices to promote the checkpoint transcriptional program, suggesting that Cds1 phosphorylation directly regulates MBF-dependent transcription. The conservation of MBF between fission and budding yeast, and recent results implicating MBF as a target of the budding yeast replication checkpoint, suggests that checkpoint regulation of the MBF transcription factor is a conserved strategy for coping with replication stress. Furthermore, the structural and regulatory similarity between MBF and E2F, the metazoan G(1)/S transcription factor, suggests that this checkpoint mechanism may be broadly conserved among eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DNA ReplicationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticCds1 protein, S pombeCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DSC1 protein, S pombeProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18662996
PMCPMC2547018
OpenAlexW2171000319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.