Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18662210›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2008

Health outcome priorities among competing cardiovascular, fall injury, and medication-related symptom outcomes.

Mary E Tinetti, Gail J McAvay, Terri R Fried, Heather G Allore, Joanna C Salmon, Joanne M Foody, Luann Bianco, Sandra Ginter, Liana Fraenkel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary E TinettiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, New Haven, Connecticut 06504, USA. mary.tinetti@yale.edu
Gail J McAvay
Terri R Fried
Heather G Allore
Joanna C Salmon
Joanne M Foody
Luann Bianco
Sandra Ginter
Liana Fraenkel
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Expanding Treatment Options for Older PersonsK24AG028443 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED, TERRI R. · 2007 to 2011
$914k
Eliciting Patient Treatment Preferences for OsteoporosisK23AR048826 · NIAMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRAENKEL, LIANA · 2004 to 2008
$659k
Treatment goals at the end of lifeK02AG020113 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED, TERRI R. · 2002 to 2006
$524k
Lipid Testing /Treatment in Older MI PatientsK08AG020623 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FOODY, JOANNE M · 2002 to 2005
$500k
Need for tailored clinical trials: hypertension and fall riskR21AG027078 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TINETTI, MARY E · 2005 to 2006
$363k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR048826NIAMS NIH HHS K23AR048826NIA NIH HHS K02 AG020113NIA NIH HHS K02AG20113NIA NIH HHS K08 AG020623NIA NIH HHS K08AG20623NIA NIH HHS K24 AG028443NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30AG21342NIA NIH HHS R21 AG027078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the priority that older adults with coexisting hypertension and fall risk give to optimizing cardiovascular outcomes versus fall- and medication symptom-related outcomes.

designInterview.

settingCommunity.

participantsOne hundred twenty-three cognitively intact persons aged 70 and older with hypertension and fall risk. MEASUREMENTS: Discrete choice task was used to elicit the relative importance placed on reducing the risk of three outcomes: cardiovascular events, serious fall injuries, and medication symptoms. Risk estimates with and without antihypertensive medications were obtained from the literature. Participants chose between 11 pairs of options that displayed lower risks for one or two outcomes and a higher risk for the other outcome(s), versus the reverse. Results were used to calculate relative importance scores for the three outcomes. These scores, which sum to 100, reflect the relative priority participants placed on the difference between the risk estimates of each outcome.

resultsSixty-two participants (50.4%) placed greater importance on reducing risk of cardiovascular events than reducing risk of the combination of fall injuries and medication symptoms; 61 participants did the converse. A lower percentage of participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P=.02), unsteadiness (P=.02), functional dependency (P=.04), lower cognition (P=.02) and depressive symptoms (P=.03) prioritized cardiovascular outcomes over fall injuries and medication symptoms than did participants without these characteristics.

conclusionInterindividual variability in the face of competing outcomes supports individualizing decision-making to individual priorities. In the current example, this may mean forgoing antihypertensive medications or compromising on blood pressure reduction for some individuals.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth PrioritiesAccidental FallsActivities of Daily LivingAgedAlzheimer DiseaseAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesDecision MakingDepressive DisorderFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth SurveysHumansIndividualityMaleAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID18662210
PMCPMC3494099
OpenAlexW2142040147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.