Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18661519›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2008

Quantitation of circulating tumor cells in blood samples from ovarian and prostate cancer patients using tumor-specific fluorescent ligands.

Wei He, Sumith A Kularatne, Kimberly R Kalli, Franklyn G Prendergast, Robert J Amato, George G Klee, Lynn C Hartmann, Philip S Low

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Circulating Tumor Cells: Emerging Frontiers in Cancer Technology.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Precision Oncology Framework Using Circulating Tumor Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Circulating biomarkers for diagnosis and response to therapies in cancer patients.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wei HeDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA.
Sumith A Kularatne
Kimberly R Kalli
Franklyn G Prendergast
Robert J Amato
George G Klee
Lynn C Hartmann
Philip S Low
Mayo Clinic · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USHouston Methodist · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Utility of serum and Tissue Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Androgen DeprivP50CA091956 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI TINDALL, DONALD J. · 2001 to 2010
$23.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA091956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can provide information on the stage of a malignancy, onset of disease progression and response to therapy. In an effort to more accurately quantitate CTCs, we have synthesized fluorescent conjugates of 2 high-affinity tumor-specific ligands (folate-AlexaFluor 488 and DUPA-FITC) that bind tumor cells >20-fold more efficiently than fluorescent antibodies. Here we determine whether these tumor-specific dyes can be exploited for quantitation of CTCs in peripheral blood samples from cancer patients. A CTC-enriched fraction was isolated from the peripheral blood of ovarian and prostate cancer patients by an optimized density gradient centrifugation protocol and labeled with the aforementioned fluorescent ligands. CTCs were then quantitated by flow cytometry. CTCs were detected in 18 of 20 ovarian cancer patients (mean 222 CTCs/ml; median 15 CTCs/ml; maximum 3,118 CTCs/ml), whereas CTC numbers in 16 gender-matched normal volunteers were negligible (mean 0.4 CTCs/ml; median 0.3 CTCs/ml; maximum 1.5 CTCs/ml; p < 0.001, chi(2)). CTCs were also detected in 10 of 13 prostate cancer patients (mean 26 CTCs/ml, median 14 CTCs/ml, maximum 94 CTCs/ml) but not in 18 gender-matched healthy donors (mean 0.8 CTCs/ml, median 1, maximum 3 CTC/ml; p < 0.0026, chi(2)). Tumor-specific fluorescent antibodies were much less efficient in quantitating CTCs because of their lower CTC labeling efficiency. Use of tumor-specific fluorescent ligands to label CTCs in peripheral blood can provide a simple, accurate and sensitive method for determining the number of cancer cells circulating in the bloodstream.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateFluorescent DyesFolic AcidHumansKB CellsLigandsMaleNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingOvarian NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsSensitivity and SpecificityFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateFluorescent DyesFolic AcidLigands

Identifiers

PMID18661519
PMCPMC2778289
OpenAlexW2085345133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.