Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18660538›Full record

ArticleGenetics2008

Dissection of darkener of apricot kinase isoform functions in Drosophila.

Arlette Kpebe, Leonard Rabinow

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Natural alleles at theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arlette KpebeSignalisation Développement et Cancer, Université Paris 11, CNRS UMR C8080, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France.
Leonard Rabinow
Signalisation, Neurobiologie et Cancer · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Darkener of apricot (Doa) locus of Drosophila encodes a LAMMER protein kinase affecting alterative splicing, and hence sex determination, via the phosphorylation of SR and SR-like proteins. Doa encodes 6 different kinases via alternative promoter usage. To provide further insight into the roles of the multiple isoforms, we mapped polymorphisms, deletions, and P-element insertions in the locus, identifying several that are largely, if not completely, isoform specific in their effects. These tests, along with the use of lines permitting overexpression and interfering RNA expression, demonstrate that the major isoforms of 55 and 105 kDa perform separate functions. The 105-kDa and a minor 138-kDa isoform are both vital but do not apparently perform functions essential for sex determination. Curiously, male-specific lethality induced by overexpression of the 55-kDa kinase in the larval fat body is rescued by coexpression of TRA, suggesting a sex-specific physiological role for this isoform. Maternal effects in which the survival of heteroallelic adults depends upon the direction of the cross are consistent with a role for a 105-kDa cytoplasmic kinase in oogenesis or early larval development.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalLarvaMaleMolecular Sequence DataOogenesisPhenotypeProtein IsoformsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDoa protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsProtein IsoformsProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasessr protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18660538
PMCPMC2516073
OpenAlexW2145639327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.