Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18658267›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2008

DNA supercoiling-dependent gene regulation in Chlamydia.

Eike Niehus, Eric Cheng, Ming Tan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Coordinated topoisomerase function shapes the fluoroquinolone response ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The T3SS structural and effector genes ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Dynamics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Repressor Function of theJournal of bacteriology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eike NiehusDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4025, USA.
Eric Cheng
Ming Tan
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

The Regulation of gene expression in ChlamydiaR01AI044198 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI TAN, MING · 1999 to 2021
$7.1M
Molecular mechanisms of gene regulation in ChlamydiaK02AI057563 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI TAN, MING · 2004 to 2008
$474k
Mechanisms of temporal gene regulation in ChlamydiaR56AI044198 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI TAN, MING · 2010 to 2010
$383k
NIAID NIH HHS AI 057563NIAID NIH HHS AI 44198NIAID NIH HHS K02 AI057563NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044198NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI044198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intracellular pathogen Chlamydia has an unusual developmental cycle marked by temporal expression patterns whose mechanisms of regulation are largely unknown. To examine if DNA topology can regulate chlamydial gene expression, we tested the in vitro activity of five chlamydial promoters at different superhelical densities. We demonstrated for the first time that individual chlamydial promoters show a differential response to changes in DNA supercoiling that correlates with the temporal expression pattern. The promoters for two midcycle genes, ompA and pgk, were responsive to alterations in supercoiling, and promoter activity could be regulated more than eightfold. In contrast, the promoters for three late transcripts, omcAB, hctA, and ltuB, were relatively insensitive to supercoiling, with promoter activity varying by no more than 2.2-fold over a range of superhelicities. To obtain a measure of how DNA supercoiling levels vary during the chlamydial developmental cycle, we recovered the cryptic chlamydial plasmid at different times after infection and assayed its superhelical density. The chlamydial plasmid was most negatively supercoiled at midcycle, with an approximate superhelical density of -0.07. At early and late times, the plasmid was more relaxed, with an approximate superhelicity of -0.03. Thus, we found a correlation between the responsiveness to supercoiling shown by the two midcycle promoters and the increased level of negative supercoiling during mid time points in the developmental cycle. Our results support a model in which the response of individual promoters to alterations in DNA supercoiling can provide a mechanism for global patterns of temporal gene expression in Chlamydia.

Indexed as

Blotting, SouthernChlamydiaDNA, BacterialDNA, SuperhelicalGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialNucleic Acid ConformationPlasmidsPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticDNA, BacterialDNA, Superhelical

Identifiers

PMID18658267
PMCPMC2566011
OpenAlexW1979345918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.