ArticleJournal of bacteriology2008
DNA supercoiling-dependent gene regulation in Chlamydia.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coordinated topoisomerase function shapes the fluoroquinolone response ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Coordinated topoisomerase function shapes the fluoroquinolone response ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The SWIB domain-containing DNA topoisomerase I ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025Article
- Late gene regulation by the alternative sigma factors ofmSystems · 2025Article
- The T3SS structural and effector genes ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Targeted repression ofmBio · 2024Article
- Chlamydia trachomatis RsbU Phosphatase Activity Is Inhibited by the Enolase Product, Phosphoenolpyruvate.Journal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Genome copy number regulates inclusion expansion, septation, and infectious developmental form conversion inJournal of bacteriology · 2021Article
- The Dynamics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Differential expression of groEL-1, incB, pyk-F, tal, hctA and omcB genes during Chlamydia trachomatis developmental cycle.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- The Repressor Function of theJournal of bacteriology · 2020Article
- Identification of new DNA-associated proteins from Waddlia chondrophila.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Inter-sigmulon communication through topological promoter coupling.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- DNA supercoiling is a fundamental regulatory principle in the control of bacterial gene expression.Biophysical reviews · 2016Review
- Regulatory (pan-)genome of an obligate intracellular pathogen in the PVC superphylum.The ISME journal · 2016Article
- DNA supercoiling is a fundamental regulatory principle in the control of bacterial gene expression.Biophysical reviews · 2016Review
- Quantifying promoter activity during the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Functional analysis of three topoisomerases that regulate DNA supercoiling levels in Chlamydia.Molecular microbiology · 2016Article
- Regulation of Chlamydia Gene Expression by Tandem Promoters with Different Temporal Patterns.Journal of bacteriology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The intracellular pathogen Chlamydia has an unusual developmental cycle marked by temporal expression patterns whose mechanisms of regulation are largely unknown. To examine if DNA topology can regulate chlamydial gene expression, we tested the in vitro activity of five chlamydial promoters at different superhelical densities. We demonstrated for the first time that individual chlamydial promoters show a differential response to changes in DNA supercoiling that correlates with the temporal expression pattern. The promoters for two midcycle genes, ompA and pgk, were responsive to alterations in supercoiling, and promoter activity could be regulated more than eightfold. In contrast, the promoters for three late transcripts, omcAB, hctA, and ltuB, were relatively insensitive to supercoiling, with promoter activity varying by no more than 2.2-fold over a range of superhelicities. To obtain a measure of how DNA supercoiling levels vary during the chlamydial developmental cycle, we recovered the cryptic chlamydial plasmid at different times after infection and assayed its superhelical density. The chlamydial plasmid was most negatively supercoiled at midcycle, with an approximate superhelical density of -0.07. At early and late times, the plasmid was more relaxed, with an approximate superhelicity of -0.03. Thus, we found a correlation between the responsiveness to supercoiling shown by the two midcycle promoters and the increased level of negative supercoiling during mid time points in the developmental cycle. Our results support a model in which the response of individual promoters to alterations in DNA supercoiling can provide a mechanism for global patterns of temporal gene expression in Chlamydia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.