Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18658194›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2008

Evaluation of aminocandin and caspofungin against Candida glabrata including isolates with reduced caspofungin susceptibility.

Gabriela E Brzankalski, Laura K Najvar, Nathan P Wiederhold, Rosie Bocanegra, Annette W Fothergill, Michael G Rinaldi, Thomas F Pattterson, John R Graybill

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriela E BrzankalskiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.
Laura K Najvar
Nathan P Wiederhold
Rosie Bocanegra
Annette W Fothergill
Michael G Rinaldi
Thomas F Pattterson
John R Graybill
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-25475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAminocandin is an investigational echinocandin with excellent activity against Candida species, including Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis. However, few data are available for this agent versus Candida glabrata. We compared the in vitro potency and in vivo efficacy of aminocandin and caspofungin against clinical isolates of C. glabrata including those with reduced caspofungin susceptibility (MIC > 2 mg/L).

methodsIn vitro activity was assessed using microdilution broth susceptibility testing. Three isolates, one with a low and two with elevated caspofungin MICs, were chosen and mice were infected with C. glabrata followed by a single dose of aminocandin or caspofungin (0.5-100 mg/kg), or daily doses of caspofungin (0.07-14.3 mg/kg) begun 1 day after inoculation. Reduction in fungal burden, assessed in kidney tissue on day 8 post-inoculation, was the marker of antifungal response.

resultsAminocandin was more potent than caspofungin against each isolate with reduced caspofungin susceptibility. Mice infected with the caspofungin-susceptible isolate had significant decreases in tissue burden with low doses of either drug. Higher single doses of aminocandin (> or = 10 mg/kg) were required to reduce fungal burden against the two isolates with elevated caspofungin MICs. Single dose administration of caspofungin was ineffective against one of these isolates, and higher daily doses were required to reduce fungal burden.

conclusionsThese studies suggest that aminocandin has the potential for extended interval dosing in the treatment of C. glabrata infections caused by susceptible isolates. However, higher doses may be required against isolates with reduced caspofungin susceptibility.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalAnimalsAntifungal AgentsCandida glabrataCandidiasisCaspofunginColony Count, MicrobialEchinocandinsKidneyLipopeptidesMaleMiceMice, Inbred ICRMicrobial Sensitivity TestsaminocandinAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptides

Identifiers

PMID18658194
PMCPMC2721694
OpenAlexW2160008210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.