ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2008
Roles for loop 2 residues of alpha1 glycine receptors in agonist activation.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allosteric modulation and direct activation of glycine receptors by a tricyclic sulfonamide.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Modulatory Actions of the Glycine Receptor β Subunit on the Positive Allosteric Modulation of Ethanol in α2 Containing Receptors.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Control of ethanol sensitivity of the glycine receptor α3 subunit by transmembrane 2, the intracellular splice cassette and C-terminal domains.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2015Article
- Glycine and GABA(A) ultra-sensitive ethanol receptors as novel tools for alcohol and brain research.Molecular pharmacology · 2014Article
- Zinc-dependent modulation of α2- and α3-glycine receptor subunits by ethanol.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2013Article
- Mutation of a zinc-binding residue in the glycine receptor α1 subunit changes ethanol sensitivity in vitro and alcohol consumption in vivo.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2013Article
- Charge and geometry of residues in the loop 2 β hairpin differentially affect agonist and ethanol sensitivity in glycine receptors.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2012Article
- Contributions of conserved residues at the gating interface of glycine receptors.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2011Article
- Allosteric modulation of glycine receptors.British journal of pharmacology · 2011Review
- Molecular requirements for ethanol differential allosteric modulation of glycine receptors based on selective Gbetagamma modulation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010Article
- Molecular targets and mechanisms for ethanol action in glycine receptors.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2010Review
- Gating mechanisms in Cys-loop receptors.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2009Review
- Structural basis of activation of cys-loop receptors: the extracellular-transmembrane interface as a coupling region.Molecular neurobiology · 2009Review
- Loop 2 structure in glycine and GABA(A) receptors plays a key role in determining ethanol sensitivity.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The present study tested the hypothesis that several residues in Loop 2 of alpha1 glycine receptors (GlyRs) play important roles in mediating the transduction of agonist activation to channel gating. This was accomplished by investigating the effect of cysteine point mutations at positions 50-60 on glycine responses in alpha1GlyRs using two-electrode voltage clamp of Xenopus oocytes. Cysteine substitutions produced position-specific changes in glycine sensitivity that were consistent with a beta-turn structure of Loop 2, with odd-numbered residues in the beta-turn interacting with other agonist-activation elements at the interface between extracellular and transmembrane domains. We also tested the hypothesis that the charge at position 53 is important for agonist activation by measuring the glycine response of wild type (WT) and E53C GlyRs exposed to methanethiosulfonate reagents. As earlier, E53C GlyRs have a significantly higher EC(50) than WT GlyRs. Exposing E53C GlyRs to the negatively charged 2-sulfonatoethyl methanethiosulfonate, but not neutral 2-hydroxyethyl methanethiosulfonate, positively charged 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate, or 2-trimethylammonioethyl methanethiosulfonate, decreased the glycine EC(50) to resemble WT GlyR responses. Exposure to these reagents did not significantly alter the glycine EC(50) for WT GlyRs. The latter findings suggest that the negative charge at position 53 is important for activation of GlyRs through its interaction with positive charge(s) in other neighboring agonist activation elements. Collectively, the findings provide the basis for a refined molecular model of alpha1GlyRs based on the recent x-ray structure of a prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel and offer insight into the structure-function relationships in GlyRs and possibly other ligand-gated ion channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.