Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18657553›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2009

Conditioned cues and the expression of stimulant sensitization in animals and humans.

Paul Vezina, Marco Leyton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Activation of the Mu-Delta Opioid Receptor Heteromers Blocks Morphine Rewarding Effects.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Drug addiction: from bench to bedside.Translational psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul VezinaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. pvezina@yoda.bsd.uchicago.edu
Marco Leyton

Funding

Sensitization and Stimulant Self-AdministrationR01DA009397 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI VEZINA, PAUL R · 1995 to 2017
$4.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DA09397NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeated intermittent exposure to psychostimulants can lead to long-lasting sensitization of the drugs' behavioral and biochemical effects. Such findings have figured importantly in recent theories of drug addiction proposing that sensitized nucleus accumbens (NAcc) dopamine (DA) overflow in particular acts in concert with other alterations in the neurochemistry of this nucleus to promote drug seeking and self-administration. Yet, experiments in rodents, non-human primates and humans have not always detected behavioral or biochemical sensitization following drug exposure, bringing into doubt the utility of this model. In an effort to reconcile apparent discrepancies in the literature, this review assesses conditions that might affect the expression of sensitization during testing. Specifically, the role played by conditioned cues is reviewed. A number of reports strongly support a potent and critical role for conditioned stimuli in the expression of sensitization. Findings suggest that stimuli associated either with the presence or absence of drug can respectively facilitate or inhibit sensitized responding. It is concluded that the presence or absence of such stimuli during testing for sensitization in animal and human studies could significantly affect the results obtained. It is necessary to consider this possibility especially when interpreting the results of studies that fail to observe sensitized responding.

Indexed as

CuesAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveBehavior, AnimalCentral Nervous System AgentsConditioning, PsychologicalHumansCentral Nervous System Agents

Identifiers

PMID18657553
PMCPMC2635339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.