Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18656544›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2008

Neutron crystallography: opportunities, challenges, and limitations.

Matthew P Blakeley, Paul Langan, Nobuo Niimura, Alberto Podjarny

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Probing Antibody Structures by Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Low barrier hydrogen bonds in protein structure and function.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. pinkIndexer - a universal indexer for pink-beam X-ray and electron diffraction snapshots.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Crystallography and Its Impact on Carbonic Anhydrase Research.International journal of medicinal chemistry · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew P BlakeleyILL, 6 Rue Jules Horowitz, BP 156, 38042 Grenoble, France. blakeleym@ill.fr
Paul Langan
Nobuo Niimura
Alberto Podjarny

Funding

Computational Tools for Neutron Protein CrystallographyR01GM071939 · NIGMS · UT-BATTELLE, LLC-OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LAB · PI COATES, LEIGHTON · 2004 to 2019
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM071939-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutron crystallography has had an important, but relatively small role in structural biology over the years. In this review of recently determined neutron structures, a theme emerges of a field currently expanding beyond its traditional boundaries, to address larger and more complex problems, with smaller samples and shorter data collection times, and employing more sophisticated structure determination and refinement methods. The origin of this transformation can be found in a number of advances including first, the development of neutron image-plates and quasi-Laue methods at nuclear reactor neutron sources and the development of time-of-flight Laue methods and electronic detectors at spallation neutron sources; second, new facilities and methods for sample perdeuteration and crystallization; third, new approaches and computational tools for structure determination.

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainCrystallographyCrystallography, X-RayElectronsEnzymesHumansModels, MolecularNeutronsNuclear ReactorsProtein ConformationQuantum TheorySensitivity and SpecificityX-RaysEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID18656544
PMCPMC2586829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.