ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2008
A comparative analysis of the genetic epidemiology of deafness in the United States in two sets of pedigrees collected more than a century apart.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linkage analysis of a large African family segregating stuttering suggests polygenic inheritance.Human genetics · 2013Trial
- A Novel Pathogenic Haplotype inBalkan medical journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Analyses of del(GJB6-D13S1830) and del(GJB6-D13S1834) deletions in a large cohort with hearing loss: Caveats to interpretation of molecular test results in multiplex families.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- Deaf intermarriage has limited effect on the prevalence of recessive deafness and no effect on underlying allelic frequency.PloS one · 2020Article
- Role of DFNB1 mutations in hereditary hearing loss among assortative mating hearing impaired families from South India.BMC medical genetics · 2018Article
- Atypical patterns of segregation of familial enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct.The Laryngoscope · 2016Article
- High incidence of GJB2 gene mutations among assortatively mating hearing impaired families in Kerala: future implications.Journal of genetics · 2014Article
- Article
- Digenic inheritance in medical genetics.Journal of medical genetics · 2013Review
- Persistence and transmission of recessive deafness and sign language: new insights from village sign languages.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2013Article
- Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness genes: a review.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2012Review
- Identification of p.A684V missense mutation in the WFS1 gene as a frequent cause of autosomal dominant optic atrophy and hearing impairment.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2011Article
- Vestibular dysfunction in DFNB1 deafness.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2011Article
- GJB2 mutations in Mongolia: complex alleles, low frequency, and reduced fitness of the deaf.Annals of human genetics · 2010Article
- Fitness among individuals with early childhood deafness: Studies in alumni families from Gallaudet University.Annals of human genetics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In 1898, E.A. Fay published an analysis of nearly 5000 marriages among deaf individuals in America collected during the 19(th) century. Each pedigree included three-generation data on marriage partners that included at least one deaf proband, who were ascertained by complete selection. We recently proposed that the intense phenotypic assortative mating among the deaf might have greatly accelerated the normally slow response to relaxed genetic selection against deafness that began in many Western countries with the introduction of sign language and the establishment of residential schools. Simulation studies suggest that this mechanism might have doubled the frequency of the commonest forms of recessive deafness (DFNB1) in this country during the past 200 years. To test this prediction, we collected pedigree data on 311 contemporary marriages among deaf individuals that were comparable to those collected by Fay. Segregation analysis of the resulting data revealed that the estimated proportion of noncomplementary matings that can produce only deaf children has increased by a factor of more than five in the past 100 years. Additional analysis within our sample of contemporary pedigrees showed that there was a statistically significant linear increase in the prevalence of pathologic GJB2 mutations when the data on 441 probands were partitioned into three 20-year birth cohorts (1920 through 1980). These data are consistent with the increase in the frequency of DFNB1 predicted by our previous simulation studies and provide convincing evidence for the important influence that assortative mating can have on the frequency of common genes for deafness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.