Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18654656›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2008

The emerging informationist specialty: a systematic review of the literature.

Jocelyn A Rankin, Suzanne F Grefsheim, Candace C Canto

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Survey of bioinformatics courses and concentrations in ALA-accredited master's programs.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2022
    Article
  3. A core competency model for clinical informationists.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021
    Article
  4. Clinical informationist educational needs and goals: A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020
    Article
  5. The clinical informationist as a new member of clinical team.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Welcoming systematic reviews to the Journal of the Medical Library Association.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Tomorrow's academic health sciences library today.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Jocelyn Anne Rankin, PhD, FMLA, 1946–2010.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2011
    Article
  15. Is the informationist a new role? A logic model analysis.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2011
    Article
  16. The informationist: building evidence for an emerging health profession.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Embedded librarians: one library's model for decentralized service.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jocelyn A RankinCDC Information Center, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop C04, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. jrankin@cdc.gov
Suzanne F Grefsheim
Candace C Canto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA systematic literature review was conducted to synthesize what is known about informationists, highlight program models, and suggest areas for future research.

methodsArticles retrieved through database searching were reviewed for relevance. Informationist case reports were identified and coded according to an attributes checklist. Data from other retained publications were synthesized under broad themes. The few research studies found were reviewed for level of evidence.

resultsOf 113 papers reviewed, the study identified 7 classic and 8 emerging informationist programs. Two major models are apparent, clinical and research, with priorities differing according to program maturity. The literature synthesis also brought together current thinking about informationist qualifications; practice roles; setting characteristics; education and training; organizational, programmatic, and service provider success factors; and challenges and barriers. Program outcomes to date are reported, and future research topics suggested. Specific findings will assist informationist program planners.

conclusionsWhile the informationist concept remains in the early adopter stage, it appears that domain knowledge, continuous learning, and embedding (working in context) are essential to success. The need for librarians to transition to greater specialization and libraries to emphasize customized service was underscored. A research agenda focused on information management, dissemination, behaviors, and economics is proposed.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalSpecializationMedical InformaticsProfessional Role

Identifiers

PMID18654656
PMCPMC2479064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.