ArticlePLoS computational biology2008
Predicting and validating protein interactions using network structure.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional selectivity of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases regulates distinct cellular outputs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Deciphering the Host-Pathogen Interactome of the Wheat-Common Bunt System: A Step towards Enhanced Resilience in Next Generation Wheat.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Deciphering the Crosstalk Mechanisms of Wheat-Stem Rust Pathosystem: Genome-Scale Prediction Unravels Novel Host Targets.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- in silico identification of protein-protein interactions in Silkworm, Bombyx mori.Bioinformation · 2014Article
- Computational Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks: Algo-rithms and Resources.Current genomics · 2013Article
- Exploiting conformational ensembles in modeling protein-protein interactions on the proteome scale.Journal of proteome research · 2013Article
- Complementing the Eukaryotic Protein Interactome.PloS one · 2013Article
- Prediction and characterization of protein-protein interaction networks in swine.Proteome science · 2012Article
- Integrating diverse biological and computational sources for reliable protein-protein interactions.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Triangle network motifs predict complexes by complementing high-error interactomes with structural information.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein interactions play a vital part in the function of a cell. As experimental techniques for detection and validation of protein interactions are time consuming, there is a need for computational methods for this task. Protein interactions appear to form a network with a relatively high degree of local clustering. In this paper we exploit this clustering by suggesting a score based on triplets of observed protein interactions. The score utilises both protein characteristics and network properties. Our score based on triplets is shown to complement existing techniques for predicting protein interactions, outperforming them on data sets which display a high degree of clustering. The predicted interactions score highly against test measures for accuracy. Compared to a similar score derived from pairwise interactions only, the triplet score displays higher sensitivity and specificity. By looking at specific examples, we show how an experimental set of interactions can be enriched and validated. As part of this work we also examine the effect of different prior databases upon the accuracy of prediction and find that the interactions from the same kingdom give better results than from across kingdoms, suggesting that there may be fundamental differences between the networks. These results all emphasize that network structure is important and helps in the accurate prediction of protein interactions. The protein interaction data set and the program used in our analysis, and a list of predictions and validations, are available at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/bioinfo/resources/PredictingInteractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.