Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18652843›Full record

ReviewNeurotoxicology2008

Methylmercury and nutrition: adult effects of fetal exposure in experimental models.

M Christopher Newland, Elliott M Paletz, Miranda N Reed

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotoxicology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Zebrafish model systems for developmental neurobehavioral toxicology.Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. SKN-1/Nrf2 inhibits dopamine neuron degeneration in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of methylmercury toxicity.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M Christopher NewlandDepartment of Psychology, 226 Thach Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5214, USA. chris.newland@auburn.edu
Elliott M Paletz
Miranda N Reed
Auburn University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

NEUROTOXICITY OF METHYLMERCURY ACROSS THE LIFESPANR01ES010865 · NIEHS · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI NEWLAND, M. CHRISTOPHER CHRISTOPHER · 2001 to 2005
$1.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES 10865NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES010865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human exposure to the life-span developmental neurotoxicant, methylmercury (MeHg), is primarily via the consumption of fish or marine mammals. Fish are also excellent sources of important nutrients, including selenium and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Laboratory models of developmental MeHg exposure can be employed to assess the roles of nutrients and MeHg and to identify potential mechanisms of action if the appropriate exposure measures are used. When maternal exposure is protracted, relationships between daily intake and brain mercury are consistent and orderly across species, even when large differences in blood:brain ratios exist. It is well established that low-level developmental MeHg produces sensory deficits. Recent studies also show that perseveration in reversal-learning tasks occurs after gestational exposures that produce low micromolar concentrations in the brain. A no-effect level has not been identified for this effect. These exposures do not affect the acquisition or performance of discrimination learning, set shifting (extradimensional shift), or memory. Reversal-learning deficits may be related to enhanced impact of reinforcers as measured using progressive ratio reinforcement schedules, an effect that could result in perseveration. Also reported is enhanced sensitivity to dopamine reuptake inhibitors and diminished sensitivity to pentobarbital, a GABA(A) agonist. Diets rich in PUFAs or selenium do not protect against MeHg's effects on reversal learning but, by themselves, may diminish variability in performance, enhance attention or psychomotor function and may confer some protection against age-related deficits in these areas. It is hypothesized that altered reward processing, dopamine and GABAergic neurotransmitter systems, and cortical regions associated with choice and perseveration are especially sensitive to developmental MeHg at low exposure levels. Human testing for MeHg's neurotoxicity should emphasize these behavioral domains.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnimalsBrainFemaleHumansMercury Poisoning, Nervous SystemMethylmercury CompoundsModels, AnimalNeurotransmitter AgentsPregnancyMethylmercury CompoundsNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID18652843
PMCPMC2659504
OpenAlexW1996046361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.