Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18652685›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2008

Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP).

Scot E Dowd, Todd R Callaway, Randall D Wolcott, Yan Sun, Trevor McKeehan, Robert G Hagevoort, Thomas S Edrington

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 465 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
465citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02535442 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

An Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Microbial Consortia and the Host Inflammatory Factors Present in the Nasal Passages of Patients During Upper Respiratory Symptomology and When Healthy

TypeobservationalSponsorKimberly-Clark CorporationRan2015 to 2016Enrolled42ConditionsCommon Cold
NCT02615912 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Single-Center, Exploratory Study to Analyze the Dynamics of Skin Microflora Following Exposure to Surfactants

TypeinterventionalSponsorKimberly-Clark CorporationRan2015 to 2016Enrolled24ConditionsDermatitisArmsPEG-40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil (Tagat CH40, Evonik) 1.5%, Lauryl glucoside (Plantacare® 1200UP, BASF) 1.5%, Sorbitan palmitate (SPANTM 40 (powder), Croda) 1.5%, Silwet* DA-63 (Momentive) 1.5%, Sodium lauryl sulfate (Sigma Aldrich) 1.0%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

465 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The evolving story ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

405 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Scot E DowdUSDA-ARS Livestock Issues Research Unit, Lubbock, TX 79403, USA. sdowd@pathogenresearch.org
Todd R Callaway
Randall D Wolcott
Yan Sun
Trevor McKeehan
Robert G Hagevoort
Thomas S Edrington

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe microbiota of an animal's intestinal tract plays important roles in the animal's overall health, productivity and well-being. There is still a scarcity of information on the microbial diversity in the gut of livestock species such as cattle. The primary reason for this lack of data relates to the expense of methods needed to generate such data. Here we have utilized a bacterial tag-encoded FLX 16s rDNA amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) approach that is able to perform diversity analyses of gastrointestinal populations. bTEFAP is relatively inexpensive in terms of both time and labor due to the implementation of a novel tag priming method and an efficient bioinformatics pipeline. We have evaluated the microbiome from the feces of 20 commercial, lactating dairy cows.

resultsUbiquitous bacteria detected from the cattle feces included Clostridium, Bacteroides, Porpyhyromonas, Ruminococcus, Alistipes, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, Lachnospira, Enterococcus, Oscillospira, Cytophage, Anaerotruncus, and Acidaminococcus spp. Foodborne pathogenic bacteria were detected in several of the cattle, a total of 4 cows were found to be positive for Salmonella spp (tentative enterica) and 6 cows were positive for Campylobacter spp. (tentative lanienae).

conclusionUsing bTEFAP we have examined the microbiota in the feces of cattle. As these methods continue to mature we will better understand the ecology of the major populations of bacteria the lower intestinal tract. This in turn will allow for a better understanding of ways in which the intestinal microbiome contributes to animal health, productivity and wellbeing.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityCattleDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID18652685
PMCPMC2515157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.