Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18652669›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2008

Modeling cellular deformations using the level set formalism.

Liu Yang, Janet C Effler, Brett L Kutscher, Sarah E Sullivan, Douglas N Robinson, Pablo A Iglesias

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Models of Cellular Mechanosensation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tools for computational analysis of moving boundary problems in cellular mechanobiology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Frequency-induced morphology alterations in microconfined biological cells.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Micropipette Aspiration of Oocytes to Assess Cortical Tension.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liu YangElectrical & Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. liuyang@jhu.edu
Janet C Effler
Brett L Kutscher
Sarah E Sullivan
Douglas N Robinson
Pablo A Iglesias
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

PHS HHS R01-71920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany cellular processes involve substantial shape changes. Traditional simulations of these cell shape changes require that grids and boundaries be moved as the cell's shape evolves. Here we demonstrate that accurate cell shape changes can be recreated using level set methods (LSM), in which the cellular shape is defined implicitly, thereby eschewing the need for updating boundaries.

resultsWe obtain a viscoelastic model of Dictyostelium cells using micropipette aspiration and show how this viscoelastic model can be incorporated into LSM simulations to recreate the observed protrusion of cells into the micropipette faithfully. We also demonstrate the use of our techniques by simulating the cell shape changes elicited by the chemotactic response to an external chemoattractant gradient.

conclusionOur results provide a simple but effective means of incorporating cellular deformations into mathematical simulations of cell signaling. Such methods will be useful for simulating important cellular events such as chemotaxis and cytokinesis.

Indexed as

Cell ShapeModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell MembraneCell SizeChemotaxisCytoskeletonDictyosteliumElasticityPressureSensitivity and SpecificityViscosity

Identifiers

PMID18652669
PMCPMC2535594
OpenAlexW2051413099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.