ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2008
Prokaryotic microbiota of recycled paper mills with low or zero effluent.
Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term direct contact with soil and plant materials leads to an immediate increase in diversity of skin microbiota.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Biostimulation proved to be the most efficient method in the comparison of in situ soil remediation treatments after a simulated oil spill accident.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016Article
- Inhibition of various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria growth on selenium nanoparticle coated paper towels.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015Article
- Metal biosorption in lignocellulosic biofuel biorefinery effluent: an initial step towards sustainability of water resources.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2012Article
- Physiology of resistant Deinococcus geothermalis bacterium aerobically cultivated in low-manganese medium.Journal of bacteriology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tendency in the paper industry is to close all water loops to save water. This leads to higher process temperatures and may increase the colloidal and dissolved material in the process circulation. Increase of nutrients in the water circuits may favor microbiological growth and fouling. In this paper the chemical and microbial compositions of water circuits and deposits were studied of two closed cycled paper/board mills, one mill totally closed (0 m(3) waste water t(-1)), and the other low discharging (about 4 m(3 )t(-1)). The zero discharge mill accumulated high amounts (>10 g C L(-1)) of organic carbon in the circulation waters, about 40% of which composed of volatile acids (lactic, acetic, propionic and butyric acid). Water contents of sulfate, chloride, sodium and calcium increased to >1 g L(-1) of each. q-PCR targeted on 16S rRNA genes indicated that the bacteria in water circuits were mainly viable cells. In both mills anaerobic growth (10(6)-10(8) CFU mL(-1)) equalled or exceeded aerobic growth, with odor problem but no actual slime problem. The major part (40%) of all identifiable bacterial sequences were closest but yet distant (<96%) to Enterococcus cecorum and in the 4 m(3 )t(-1) discharging mill also Bacillus thermoamylovorans and Bacillus coagulans. Slimes and deposits from the mills contained high amounts, > or =10(8) g(-1), of archaean, but only the genus Methanothrix was identifiable from the cloned sequences. The findings indicate that closing the water circuits strongly limited diversity of the microbiota but allowed efficient mineralization of the dissolved and suspended matter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18651188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.