Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18651188›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2008

Prokaryotic microbiota of recycled paper mills with low or zero effluent.

Charlotta Kanto Oqvist, Jukka Kurola, Jaakko Pakarinen, Jaakko Ekman, Satu Ikävalko, Jaakko Simell, Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotta Kanto OqvistDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, Biocenter, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jukka Kurola
Jaakko Pakarinen
Jaakko Ekman
Satu Ikävalko
Jaakko Simell
Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tendency in the paper industry is to close all water loops to save water. This leads to higher process temperatures and may increase the colloidal and dissolved material in the process circulation. Increase of nutrients in the water circuits may favor microbiological growth and fouling. In this paper the chemical and microbial compositions of water circuits and deposits were studied of two closed cycled paper/board mills, one mill totally closed (0 m(3) waste water t(-1)), and the other low discharging (about 4 m(3 )t(-1)). The zero discharge mill accumulated high amounts (>10 g C L(-1)) of organic carbon in the circulation waters, about 40% of which composed of volatile acids (lactic, acetic, propionic and butyric acid). Water contents of sulfate, chloride, sodium and calcium increased to >1 g L(-1) of each. q-PCR targeted on 16S rRNA genes indicated that the bacteria in water circuits were mainly viable cells. In both mills anaerobic growth (10(6)-10(8) CFU mL(-1)) equalled or exceeded aerobic growth, with odor problem but no actual slime problem. The major part (40%) of all identifiable bacterial sequences were closest but yet distant (<96%) to Enterococcus cecorum and in the 4 m(3 )t(-1) discharging mill also Bacillus thermoamylovorans and Bacillus coagulans. Slimes and deposits from the mills contained high amounts, > or =10(8) g(-1), of archaean, but only the genus Methanothrix was identifiable from the cloned sequences. The findings indicate that closing the water circuits strongly limited diversity of the microbiota but allowed efficient mineralization of the dissolved and suspended matter.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyBacteriaConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalIndustrial WasteMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWaterDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalIndustrial WasteRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.