[European Stroke Organisation 2008 guidelines for managing acute cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack : part 2].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Early single center experience with the solitaire thrombectomy device for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2011
   Trial
2. Mechanical thrombectomy devices for endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke: Duke stroke center experience.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2012
   Article
3. A comparison of 2 stroke devices: the new Aperio clot-removal device and the solitaire AB/FR.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2012
   Article
4. [Stroke and atrial fibrillation].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2009
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as