ArticleJournal of human genetics2008
New correction algorithms for multiple comparisons in case-control multilocus association studies based on haplotypes and diplotype configurations.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin D and calcium-sensing receptor polymorphisms differentially associate with resting energy expenditure in peripubertal children.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2013Article
- ParaHaplo 2.0: a program package for haplotype-estimation and haplotype-based whole-genome association study using parallel computing.Source code for biology and medicine · 2010Article
- ParaHaplo: A program package for haplotype-based whole-genome association study using parallel computing.Source code for biology and medicine · 2009Article
- Phylogeography of two moray eels indicates high dispersal throughout the indo-pacific.The Journal of heredityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The multiple comparison problem arises in population-based studies when the association between phenotypes and multilocus genotypes is examined. Although Bonferroni's correction is often used to cope with such a problem, it may yield too conservative conclusions because all of the tests are assumed to be independent. We have developed new correction algorithms for the test of independence between phenotypes and multilocus genotypes at loci in linkage disequilibrium. In one of the algorithms, the exact type I error rate is calculated for the independency test. We found that such exact probabilities can be calculated using a 128 CPU PC cluster if the numbers of cases and controls are not more than 50. As an alternative method, we developed algorithms to calculate asymptotically the type I error rates using a Markov-chain Monte Carlo sampler that provided a good approximation to values calculated by the exact method. When the new algorithms were applied to both simulation and real data, the real overall type I error rates for the loci in linkage disequilibrium were from one-third to half as high as those obtained by Bonferroni's correction. These algorithms are likely to be useful for multilocus association studies for data obtained by case-control and cohort studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18651098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.