Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18650351›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2008

Detection of 11 common viral and bacterial pathogens causing community-acquired pneumonia or sepsis in asymptomatic patients by using a multiplex reverse transcription-PCR assay with manual (enzyme hybridization) or automated (electronic microarray) detection.

Swati Kumar, Lihua Wang, Jiang Fan, Andrea Kraft, Michael E Bose, Sagarika Tiwari, Meredith Van Dyke, Robert Haigis, Tingquo Luo, Madhushree Ghosh and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Viral infection in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Respiratory viral sepsis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Indian journal of medical research · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Laboratory Diagnosis of Pertussis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Swati KumarPediatric Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-1997, USA.
Lihua Wang
Jiang Fan
Andrea Kraft
Michael E Bose
Sagarika Tiwari
Meredith Van Dyke
Robert Haigis
Tingquo Luo
Madhushree Ghosh
Huong Tang
Marjan Haghnia
Elizabeth L Mather
William G Weisburg
Kelly J Henrickson
Nanogen (United States) · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USChildren's Hospital of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Diagnostics for Sepsis and Community-Acquired PneumoniaU01AI066584 · NIAID · NEXOGEN, INC. · PI MATHER, PH.D., ELIZABETH L · 2005 to 2009
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS AI066584NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI066584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and sepsis are important causes of morbidity and mortality. We describe the development of two molecular assays for the detection of 11 common viral and bacterial agents of CAP and sepsis: influenza virus A, influenza virus B, respiratory syncytial virus A (RSV A), RSV B, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Legionella micdadei, Bordetella pertussis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Further, we report the prevalence of carriage of these pathogens in respiratory, skin, and serum specimens from 243 asymptomatic children and adults. The detection of pathogens was done using both a manual enzyme hybridization assay and an automated electronic microarray following reverse transcription and PCR amplification. The analytical sensitivities ranged between 0.01 and 100 50% tissue culture infective doses, cells, or CFU per ml for both detection methods. Analytical specificity testing demonstrated no significant cross-reactivity among 19 other common respiratory organisms. One hundred spiked "surrogate" clinical specimens were all correctly identified with 100% specificity (95% confidence interval, 100%). Overall, 28 (21.7%) of 129 nasopharyngeal specimens, 11 of 100 skin specimens, and 2 of 100 serum specimens from asymptomatic subjects tested positive for one or more pathogens, with S. pneumoniae and S. aureus giving 89% of the positive results. Our data suggest that asymptomatic carriage makes the use of molecular assays problematic for the detection of S. pneumoniae or S. aureus in upper respiratory tract secretions; however, the specimens tested showed virtually no carriage of the other nine viral and bacterial pathogens, and the detection of these pathogens should not be a significant diagnostic problem. In addition, slightly less sensitive molecular assays may have better correlation with clinical disease in the case of CAP.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCarrier StateChildCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA ProbesDNA, ViralHumansNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPneumonia, BacterialPneumonia, ViralReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA ProbesDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID18650351
PMCPMC2546717
OpenAlexW2075418973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.