Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18648745›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastroenterology2008

Leukocytapheresis for the treatment of active pouchitis: a pilot study.

Yasumi Araki, Keiichi Mitsuyama, Takaaki Nagae, Yuji Tou, Motonori Nakagawa, Yasue Iwatani, Masakazu Harada, Hiroyuki Ozasa, Michio Sata, Toshihiro Noake

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastroenterology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pouchitis: a practical guide.Frontline gastroenterology · 2013
    Review
  3. Diagnosis and management of postoperative ileal pouch disorders.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasumi ArakiKurume Coloproctology Center, Kurume, Japan.
Keiichi Mitsuyama
Takaaki Nagae
Yuji Tou
Motonori Nakagawa
Yasue Iwatani
Masakazu Harada
Hiroyuki Ozasa
Michio Sata
Toshihiro Noake
Kurume University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPouchitis is a major long-term complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of leukocytapheresis for the treatment of active pouchitis.

methodsEight patients with active pouchitis received leukocytapheresis weekly for 5 weeks in an open-label treatment protocol together with baseline therapy.

resultsPatients showed significant improvement in their pouchitis disease activity index scores, from 9.5 (range, 8-10) to 4.0 (range, 2-8) (P < 0.05). Six (75%) of the 8 treated patients achieved remission. No adverse events were observed.

conclusionsLeukocytapheresis therapy could be a new therapeutic strategy for patients with pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. These encouraging results lead us to propose a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

LeukapheresisAdultAgedColectomyColitis, UlcerativeColonic PouchesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPouchitis

Identifiers

PMID18648745
OpenAlexW2049843783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.