Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18648667›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

Interaction between Purkinje cells and inhibitory interneurons may create adjustable output waveforms to generate timed cerebellar output.

Simon Hong, Lance M Optican

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pharmacological tests of hypotheses for acquired pendular nystagmus.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2011
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Dynamic associations in the cerebellar-motoneuron network during motor learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon HongLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Lance M Optican
National Eye Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Neural Control Of GazeZIAEY000302 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI OPTICAN, LANCE M · 2009 to 2019
$10.2M
NEURAL CONTROL OF GAZEZ01EY000302 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI OPTICAN, LANCE M · 1995 to 2008
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We develop a new model that explains how the cerebellum may generate the timing in classical delay eyeblink conditioning. Recent studies show that both Purkinje cells (PCs) and inhibitory interneurons (INs) have parallel signal processing streams with two time scales: an AMPA receptor-mediated fast process and a metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR)-mediated slow process. Moreover, one consistent finding is an increased excitability of PC dendrites (in Larsell's lobule HVI) in animals when they acquire the classical delay eyeblink conditioning naturally, in contrast to in vitro studies, where learning involves long-term depression (LTD). Our model proposes that the delayed response comes from the slow dynamics of mGluR-mediated IP3 activation, and the ensuing calcium concentration change, and not from LTP/LTD. The conditioned stimulus (tone), arriving on the parallel fibers, triggers this slow activation in INs and PC spines. These excitatory (from PC spines) and inhibitory (from INs) signals then interact at the PC dendrites to generate variable waveforms of PC activation. When the unconditioned stimulus (puff), arriving on the climbing fibers, is coupled frequently with this slow activation the waveform is amplified (due to an increased excitability) and leads to a timed pause in the PC population. The disinhibition of deep cerebellar nuclei by this timed pause causes the delayed conditioned response. This suggested PC-IN interaction emphasizes a richer role of the INs in learning and also conforms to the recent evidence that mGluR in the cerebellar cortex may participate in slow motor execution. We show that the suggested mechanism can endow the cerebellar cortex with the versatility to learn almost any temporal pattern, in addition to those that arise in classical conditioning.

Indexed as

Conditioning, EyelidAnimalsCerebellumGolgi ApparatusInterneuronsLearningMiceModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalNeuronsPurkinje CellsReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateSignal TransductionSoftwareSynapsesReceptors, Metabotropic Glutamate

Identifiers

PMID18648667
PMCPMC2474676
OpenAlexW2076755770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.