Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18648644›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

Brucellosis vaccines: assessment of Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide rough mutants defective in core and O-polysaccharide synthesis and export.

David González, María-Jesús Grilló, María-Jesús De Miguel, Tara Ali, Vilma Arce-Gorvel, Rose-May Delrue, Raquel Conde-Alvarez, Pilar Muñoz, Ignacio López-Goñi, Maite Iriarte and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Combination ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Isolation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

David GonzálezDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
María-Jesús Grilló
María-Jesús De Miguel
Tara Ali
Vilma Arce-Gorvel
Rose-May Delrue
Raquel Conde-Alvarez
Pilar Muñoz
Ignacio López-Goñi
Maite Iriarte
Clara-M Marín
Andrej Weintraub
Göran Widmalm
Michel Zygmunt
Jean-Jacques Letesson
Jean-Pierre Gorvel
José-María Blasco
Ignacio Moriyón
Universidad de Navarra · ESGobierno de Aragón · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRStockholm University · SEUniversity of Namur · BEAgrobiotechnology Institute · ESInfectiologie Animale et Santé Publique · FRKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe brucellae are facultative intracellular bacteria that cause brucellosis, one of the major neglected zoonoses. In endemic areas, vaccination is the only effective way to control this disease. Brucella melitensis Rev 1 is a vaccine effective against the brucellosis of sheep and goat caused by B. melitensis, the commonest source of human infection. However, Rev 1 carries a smooth lipopolysaccharide with an O-polysaccharide that elicits antibodies interfering in serodiagnosis, a major problem in eradication campaigns. Because of this, rough Brucella mutants lacking the O-polysaccharide have been proposed as vaccines. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo examine the possibilities of rough vaccines, we screened B. melitensis for lipopolysaccharide genes and obtained mutants representing all main rough phenotypes with regard to core oligosaccharide and O-polysaccharide synthesis and export. Using the mouse model, mutants were classified into four attenuation patterns according to their multiplication and persistence in spleens at different doses. In macrophages, mutants belonging to three of these attenuation patterns reached the Brucella characteristic intracellular niche and multiplied intracellularly, suggesting that they could be suitable vaccine candidates. Virulence patterns, intracellular behavior and lipopolysaccharide defects roughly correlated with the degree of protection afforded by the mutants upon intraperitoneal vaccination of mice. However, when vaccination was applied by the subcutaneous route, only two mutants matched the protection obtained with Rev 1 albeit at doses one thousand fold higher than this reference vaccine. These mutants, which were blocked in O-polysaccharide export and accumulated internal O-polysaccharides, stimulated weak anti-smooth lipopolysaccharide antibodies. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results demonstrate that no rough mutant is equal to Rev 1 in laboratory models and question the notion that rough vaccines are suitable for the control of brucellosis in endemic areas.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsBrucella melitensisBrucella VaccineBrucellosisFemaleLipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalOpen Reading FramesPolysaccharidesSheepStem CellsVirulenceBrucella VaccineLipopolysaccharidesPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID18648644
PMCPMC2453230
OpenAlexW2057071287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.