SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Wound-care teams for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- A nomogram to predict the risk of surgery-related pressure ulcers in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- Establishment and Application of Pressure Injury Assessment Module in Operating Room Based on Information Management System.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Pressure injury prevention and management practices among nurses: A realist case study.International wound journal · 2019Article
- Individualized Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pressure Injury Management: Development of an Integrated Multi-Modal Biomedical Information Resource.JMIR research protocols · 2018Article
- Demonstrating the Potential of Using Transcutaneous Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Tensions to Assess the Risk of Pressure Injuries.International journal of biological sciences · 2018Article
- Implementation of pressure ulcer prevention best practice recommendations in acute care: an observational study.International wound journal · 2013Observational
- Translation and testing of the Risk Assessment Pressure Ulcer Sore scale used among residents in Norwegian nursing homes.BMJ open · 2012Article
- Evidence-based treatment of chronic leg ulcers.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011Review
- Development of the interRAI Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale (PURS) for use in long-term care and home care settings.BMC geriatrics · 2010Article
- Do pressure ulcer risk assessment scales improve clinical practice?Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2010Article
- Decubitus ulcers: pathophysiology and primary prevention.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2010Review
- Use of pressure-redistributing support surfaces among elderly hip fracture patients across the continuum of care: adherence to pressure ulcer prevention guidelines.The Gerontologist · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPressure ulcer risk assessment is a component of the assessment process used to identify individuals at risk of developing a pressure ulcer. Use of a risk assessment tool is recommended by many international pressure ulcer prevention guidelines however it is not known whether using a risk assessment tool makes a difference to patient outcomes. A review was conducted to clarify the role of pressure ulcer risk assessment in clinical practice.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to determine whether using structured, systematic pressure ulcer risk assessment tools, in any health care setting, reduces the incidence of pressure ulcers. SEARCH STRATEGY: The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (January 1966 to April Week 3, 2008); EMBASE (1974 to Week 17, 2008); CINAHL (1982 to April Week 4, 2008); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2008); The Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 29/4/2008). There were no restrictions on articles on the basis of language or date of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of structured, systematic, pressure ulcer risk assessment tools with no structured pressure ulcer risk assessment, or with unaided clinical judgement, or RCTs comparing the use of different structured pressure ulcer risk assessment tools were considered for this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Titles and, where available, abstracts of the studies identified by the search strategy were assessed by two authors independently for their eligibility. Full versions of potentially relevant studies were obtained and screened against the inclusion criteria by two authors independently. MAIN
resultsNo studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS'
conclusionsDespite the widespread use of risk assessment tools for the assessment of individuals' risk of developing pressure ulcers, no randomised trials exist that compare them with unaided clinical judgement or no risk assessment in terms of rates of pressure ulceration. Therefore, we cannot conclude whether the use of structured, systematic pressure ulcer risk assessment tools, in any health care setting, reduces the incidence of pressure ulcers. The effect of structured risk assessment tools on pressure ulcer incidence needs to be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18646157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.