Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18646140›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer pain in adults.

Karen A Robb, Michael I Bennett, Mark I Johnson, Karen J Simpson, Stephen G Oxberry

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. What Does the Cochrane Collaboration Say about the Treatment of Pain?Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2011
    Article
  17. The effect of in-patient chest physiotherapy in lung cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karen A RobbPhysiotherapy Department, Bart's Hospital, Kenton and Lucas Block, West Smithfield, London, UK, EC1A 7BE. karen.robb@bartsandthelondon.nhs.uk
Michael I Bennett
Mark I Johnson
Karen J Simpson
Stephen G Oxberry
Lancaster University · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer-related pain is complex and multi-dimensional but the mainstay of cancer pain management has predominately used a biomedical approach. There is a need for non-pharmacological and innovative approaches. Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) may have a role for a significant number of patients but the effectiveness of TENS is currently unknown.

objectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of TENS for cancer-related pain in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED and PEDRO databases (11/04/08). SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials (RCTS) investigating the use of TENS for the management of cancer-related pain in adults were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The search strategy identified 37 possible published studies which were divided between two pairs of review authors that decided on study selection. A study eligibility form was used to screen each abstract and where study eligibility could not be determined from the abstract, the full paper was obtained and assessed by one pair of review authors. A standardised data extraction sheet was used to collect information on the studies and the quality of the studies was assessed independently by two review authors using the validated five-point Oxford Quality Scale. Final scores were discussed and agreed between all four review authors. The small sample sizes and differences in patient study populations of the two included studies prevented meta-analysis. MAIN

resultsOnly two RCTs met the eligibility criteria (64 participants). These studies were heterogenous with respect to study population, sample size, study design, methodological quality, mode of TENS, treatment duration, method of administration and outcome measures used. In one RCT, there were no significant differences between TENS and placebo in women with chronic pain secondary to breast cancer treatment. In the other RCT, there were no significant differences between acupuncture-type TENS and sham in palliative care patients; this study was underpowered. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe results of this systematic review are inconclusive due to a lack of suitable RCTs. Large multi-centre RCTs are required to assess the value of TENS in the management of cancer-related pain in adults.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementAdultHumansNeoplasmsPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranscutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID18646140
OpenAlexW4247330929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.