SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Antithrombin III for critically ill patients.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antithrombin III for critically ill patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Antithrombin III for critically ill patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Nebulized anticoagulants for acute lung injury - a systematic review of preclinical and clinical investigations.Critical care (London, England) · 2012Pooled it
- Recommendations for the transfusion management of patients in the peri-operative period. II. The intra-operative period.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2011Guideline
- Recommendations for the transfusion management of patients in the peri-operative period. I. The pre-operative period.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2011Guideline
- Co-administration of iloprost and eptifibatide in septic shock (CO-ILEPSS)-a randomised, controlled, double-blind investigator-initiated trial investigating safety and efficacy.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Immune modulation after traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Endothelial glycocalyx damage as a systemic inflammatory microvascular endotheliopathy in COVID-19.Biomedical journal · 2020Review
- Targeting coagulation activation in severe COVID-19 pneumonia: lessons from bacterial pneumonia and sepsis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020Review
- A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on Anticoagulant Therapy in Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Antithrombin plus alpha-1 protease inhibitor does not affect coagulation and inflammation in two murine models of acute lung injury.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2019Article
- Anticoagulation with VADs and ECMO: walking the tightrope.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2017Review
- Antithrombin III Protects Against Contrast-Induced Nephropathy.EBioMedicine · 2017Article
- Nebulized heparin for patients under mechanical ventilation: an individual patient data meta-analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2016Review
- Present and future of anticoagulant therapy using antithrombin and thrombomodulin for sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation: a perspective from Japan.International journal of hematology · 2016Review
- Antithrombin in the treatment of burn trauma.World journal of critical care medicine · 2016Review
- SYSTEM-WIDE MAPPING OF ACTIVATED CIRCUITRY IN EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2016Article
- Implications of recent accumulating knowledge about endothelial glycocalyx on anesthetic management.Journal of anesthesia · 2015Review
- Is antithrombin treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation a quixotic goal?Critical care (London, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCritical illness is associated with uncontrolled inflammation and vascular damage which can result in multiple organ failure and death. Antithrombin III (AT III) is an anticoagulant with anti-inflammatory properties but the efficacy and any harmful effects of AT III supplementation in critically ill patients are unknown.
objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of AT III in critically ill patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); MEDLINE; EMBASE; Science Citation Index Expanded; International Web of Science; CINAHL; LILACS; and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (up to November 2006). We contacted authors and manufacturers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized clinical trials, irrespective of blinding or language, that compared AT III with no intervention or placebo in critically ill patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Our primary outcome measure was mortality. We each independently abstracted data and resolved any disagreements by discussion. We presented pooled estimates of the intervention effects on dichotomous outcomes as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We performed subgroup analyses to assess risk of bias, the effect of AT III in different populations (sepsis, trauma, obstetric, and paediatric patients), and the effect of AT III in patients with or without the use of concomitant heparin. We assessed the adequacy of the available number of participants and performed a trial sequential analysis to establish the implications for further research. MAIN
resultsWe included 20 randomized trials with a total of 3458 participants; 13 of these trials had high risk of bias. When we combined all trials, AT III did not statistically significantly reduce overall mortality compared with the control group (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03; no heterogeneity between trials). A total of 32 subgroup and sensitivity analyses were carried out. Analyses based on risk of bias, different populations, and the role of adjuvant heparin gave insignificant differences. AT III reduced the multiorgan failure score among survivors in an analysis involving very few patients. AT III increased bleeding events (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.78). AUTHORS'
conclusionsAT III cannot be recommended for critically ill patients based on the available evidence. A randomized controlled trial of AT III, without adjuvant heparin, with prespecified inclusion criteria and good bias protection is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.