Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18646125›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Antithrombin III for critically ill patients.

Arash Afshari, Jørn Wetterslev, Jesper Brok, Ann Merete Møller

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antithrombin III for critically ill patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Targeting coagulation activation in severe COVID-19 pneumonia: lessons from bacterial pneumonia and sepsis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Anticoagulation with VADs and ECMO: walking the tightrope.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Antithrombin in the treatment of burn trauma.World journal of critical care medicine · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arash AfshariDepartment of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark, 2100. arriba_a@yahoo.dk
Jørn Wetterslev
Jesper Brok
Ann Merete Møller
Rigshospitalet · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical illness is associated with uncontrolled inflammation and vascular damage which can result in multiple organ failure and death. Antithrombin III (AT III) is an anticoagulant with anti-inflammatory properties but the efficacy and any harmful effects of AT III supplementation in critically ill patients are unknown.

objectivesTo assess the benefits and harms of AT III in critically ill patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); MEDLINE; EMBASE; Science Citation Index Expanded; International Web of Science; CINAHL; LILACS; and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (up to November 2006). We contacted authors and manufacturers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized clinical trials, irrespective of blinding or language, that compared AT III with no intervention or placebo in critically ill patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Our primary outcome measure was mortality. We each independently abstracted data and resolved any disagreements by discussion. We presented pooled estimates of the intervention effects on dichotomous outcomes as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We performed subgroup analyses to assess risk of bias, the effect of AT III in different populations (sepsis, trauma, obstetric, and paediatric patients), and the effect of AT III in patients with or without the use of concomitant heparin. We assessed the adequacy of the available number of participants and performed a trial sequential analysis to establish the implications for further research. MAIN

resultsWe included 20 randomized trials with a total of 3458 participants; 13 of these trials had high risk of bias. When we combined all trials, AT III did not statistically significantly reduce overall mortality compared with the control group (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03; no heterogeneity between trials). A total of 32 subgroup and sensitivity analyses were carried out. Analyses based on risk of bias, different populations, and the role of adjuvant heparin gave insignificant differences. AT III reduced the multiorgan failure score among survivors in an analysis involving very few patients. AT III increased bleeding events (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.78). AUTHORS'

conclusionsAT III cannot be recommended for critically ill patients based on the available evidence. A randomized controlled trial of AT III, without adjuvant heparin, with prespecified inclusion criteria and good bias protection is needed.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntithrombin IIICritical IllnessHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnticoagulantsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntithrombin III

Identifiers

PMID18646125
OpenAlexW208593668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.