SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Fraction size in radiation treatment for breast conservation in early breast cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer V: Therapy for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer, as well as local therapy in cases with synchronous distant metastases.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2015Guideline
- One versus three weeks hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer treatment: the FAST-Forward phase III RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2023Trial
- Topical atorvastatin 1% for prevention of skin toxicity in patients receiving radiation therapy for breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Trial
- Intensity-modulated and hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost adjuvant breast radiation employing statics ports of tomotherapy (TomoDirect): a prospective phase II trial.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2014Trial
- Hypofractionation as a solution to radiotherapy access in latin america: expert perspective.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022Review
- Hybrid planning techniques for hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation using flattening filter-free beams.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020Article
- Five-year results of a prospective case series of accelerated hypofractionated whole breast radiation with concomitant boost to the surgical bed after conserving surgery for early breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShortening the duration of radiation therapy would benefit women with early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. It may also improve access to radiation therapy by improving efficiency in radiation oncology departments globally. This can only happen if the shorter treatment is as effective and safe as conventional radiation therapy.
objectivesTo assess the effects of altered fraction size on women with early breast cancer who have undergone breast conserving surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register (June 2006), MEDLINE (November 2006), EMBASE (November 2006), reference lists for articles, and relevant conference proceedings. No language constraints were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of unconventional versus conventional fractionation in women with early breast cancer who had undergone breast conserving surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction was performed independently by the authors with disagreements resolved by discussion. Missing data was sought by contacting the authors concerned. MAIN
resultsTwo trials were included and reported on 2644 women. The women were highly selected with node negative tumours smaller than 5 cm and negative pathological margins; 46% of the women had a cup separation size of less than 25 cm. The studies were of high quality. Data for local recurrence and breast appearance were not available in a form which could be combined. Unconventional fractionation (delivering radiation therapy in larger amounts each day but over fewer days than with conventional fractionation) did not appear to affect: (1) local-recurrence free survival (absolute difference 0.4%, 95% CI -1.5% to 2.4%), (2) breast appearance (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.17; P = 0.86), (3) survival at five years (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; P = 0.75), (4) late skin toxicity at five years (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.22; P = 0.98, or (5) late radiation toxicity in sub-cutaneous tissue (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.28; P = 0.99). AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe have evidence from two high quality randomised trials that the use of unconventional fractionation regimes (greater than 2 Gy per fraction) does not affect breast appearance or toxicity and does not seem to affect local recurrence for selected women treated with breast conserving therapy. These are women with node negative tumours smaller than 5 cm and negative pathological margins. Two new trials have been published in March 2008. Their results are consistent with our findings. The results of these trials will be incorporated in the next update of this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18646095What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.