Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18645603›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2007

Parallel gene expression profiling of mantle cell lymphoma - how do we transform 'omics data into clinical practice.

Ek Sara, Carl Ak Borrebaeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ek SaraCREAT Health, Lund University, BMC D13, SE-221 84, Lund, Sweden.
Carl Ak Borrebaeck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA microarray technology has been a valuable tool to provide a global view of the changes in gene expression that characterize different types of B cell lymphomas, both in relation to clinical parameters but also in comparison with the non-malignant counterparts. The number of transcripts that can be analyzed on an array has dramatically increased, and now most commercially available arrays cover the whole genome, enabling overall analysis of the transcriptome.The backside of collecting this massive amount of information is that even after strict data filtering, it is impossible to do follow-up studies on all findings. Down-stream analysis is time-consuming and when performing confirmatory experiments on the protein level, the experiments are in most cases restricted to proteins recognized by commercially available reagents. Furthermore, since gene expression data is a comparative method not only are the experimental set-up but also the characteristics of both the sample and reference crucial for our ability to answer the questions posed. Thus, initial care must be taken in the design of the experiment and the preparation of the samples.The aim of this review is to discuss the progress in mantle cell lymphoma research enabled by gene expression analysis and to pinpoint the difficulties in making efficient use of the generated data to provide a fast and accurate clinical diagnosis, efficient stratification of patients into disease sub-groups and improved therapy.

Identifiers

PMID18645603
PMCPMC2435353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.