Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18645598›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2007

Osmoadaptation of Mammalian cells - an orchestrated network of protective genes.

Küper Christoph, Franz-X Beck, Wolfgang Neuhofer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Passive coupling of membrane tension and cell volume during active response of cells to osmosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. High NaBiomedicines · 2021
    Review
  7. EnterotoxigenicGut microbes · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hypertonic stress induces rapid and widespread protein damage in C. elegans.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Küper ChristophDepartment of Physiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Franz-X Beck
Wolfgang Neuhofer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals, the cells of the renal medulla are physiologically exposed to interstitial osmolalities several-fold higher that found in any other tissue. Nevertheless, these cells not only have the ability to survive in this harsh environment, but also to function normally, which is critical for maintenance of systemic electrolyte and fluid homeostasis. Over the last two decades, a substantial body of evidence has accumulated, indicating that sequential and well orchestrated genomic responses are required to provide tolerance to osmotic stress. This includes the enhanced expression and action of immediate-early genes, growth arrest and DNA damage inducible genes (GADDs), genes involved in cell cycle control and apoptosis, heat shock proteins, and ultimately that of genes involved in the intracellular accumulation of nonperturbing organic osmolytes. The present review summarizes the sequence of genomic responses conferring resistance against osmotic stress. In addition, the regulatory mechanisms mediating the coordinated genomic response to osmotic stress will be highlighted.

Indexed as

gene expressionosmoadaptationosmoprotective genesOsmotic stressrenal medullary cells

Identifiers

PMID18645598
PMCPMC2430686
OpenAlexW1972404977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.