Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18645196›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2008

Sizing the Bacillus anthracis PA63 channel with nonelectrolyte poly(ethylene glycols).

Brian J Nablo, Kelly M Halverson, Joseph W F Robertson, Tam L Nguyen, Rekha G Panchal, Rick Gussio, Sina Bavari, Oleg V Krasilnikov, John J Kasianowicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Nanopore sensing: A physical-chemical approach.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2021
    Review
  5. Site-Specific Labeling andBiochemistry · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brian J NabloElectrical and Electronics Laboratory, Semiconductor Electronics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8120, USA.
Kelly M Halverson
Joseph W F Robertson
Tam L Nguyen
Rekha G Panchal
Rick Gussio
Sina Bavari
Oleg V Krasilnikov
John J Kasianowicz

Funding

NCI NIH HHS N01 CO012400NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonelectrolyte polymers of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) were used to estimate the diameter of the ion channel formed by the Bacillus anthracis protective antigen 63 (PA(63)). Based on the ability of different molecular weight PEGs to partition into the pore and reduce channel conductance, the pore appears to be narrower than the one formed by Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin. Numerical integration of the PEG sample mass spectra and the channel conductance data were used to refine the estimate of the pore's PEG molecular mass cutoff (approximately 1400 g/mol). The results suggest that the limiting diameter of the PA(63) pore is <2 nm, which is consistent with an all-atom model of the PA(63) channel and previous experiments using large ions.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalModels, MolecularAntigens, BacterialBacillus anthracisBacterial ToxinsComputer SimulationElectrolytesPolyethylene GlycolsPorosityProtein Conformationanthrax toxinAntigens, BacterialBacterial ToxinsElectrolytesPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID18645196
PMCPMC2479592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.