Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18642125›Full record

ArticleBasic research in cardiology2008

Effects of unipolar stimulation on voltage and calcium distributions in the isolated rabbit heart.

Veniamin Y Sidorov, Mark R Holcomb, Marcella C Woods, Richard A Gray, John P Wikswo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic research in cardiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The strength-interval curve in cardiac tissue.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Veniamin Y SidorovDept. of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mark R Holcomb
Marcella C Woods
Richard A Gray
John P Wikswo

Funding

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF CARDIAC BIDOMAINR01HL058241 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BAUDENBACHER, FRANZ JOSEF, GRAY, RICHARD A. · 1997 to 2010
$4.0M
VIDEO IMAGING OF CARDIAC REENTRY INITIATION/TERMINATIONR01HL063267 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GRAY, RICHARD A. · 2000 to 2003
$906k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL058241NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL063267NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL58241NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL63267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of electric stimulation on the polarization of cardiac tissue (virtual electrode effect) is well known; the corresponding response of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) and its dependence on coupling interval between conditioning stimulus (S1) and test stimulus (S2) has yet to be elucidated.

objectiveBecause uncovering the transmembrane potential (V(m))-[Ca(2+)](i) relationship during an electric shock is imperative for understanding arrhythmia induction and defibrillation, we aimed to study simultaneous V(m) and [Ca(2+)](i) responses to strong unipolar stimulation.

methodsWe used a dual-camera optical system to image concurrently V (m) and [Ca(2+)](i) responses to unipolar stimulation (20 ms +/- 20 mA) in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. RH-237 and Rhod-2 fluorescent dyes were used to measure V(m) and [Ca(2+)](i), respectively. The S1-S2 interval ranged from 10 to 170 ms to examine stimulation during the action potential.

resultsThe [Ca(2+)](i) deflections were less pronounced than changes in V(m) for all S1-S2 intervals. For cathodal stimulation, [Ca(2+)](i) at the central virtual cathode region increased with prolongation of S1-S2 interval. For anodal stimulation, [Ca(2+)](i) at the central virtual anode area decreased with shortening of the S1-S2 interval. At very short S1-S2 intervals (10-20 ms), when S2 polarization was superimposed on the S1 action potential upstroke, the [Ca(2+)](i) distribution did not follow V(m) and produced a more complex pattern. After S2 termination [Ca(2+)](i) exhibited three outcomes in a manner similar to V(m): non-propagating response, break stimulation, and make stimulation.

conclusionsChanges in the [Ca(2+)](i) distribution correlate with the behavior of the V (m) distribution for S1-S2 coupling intervals longer than 20 ms; at shorter intervals S2 creates more heterogeneous [Ca(2+)](i) distribution in comparison with V(m). Stimulation in diastole and at very short coupling intervals caused V(m)-[Ca(2+)](i) uncoupling at the regions of positive polarization (virtual cathode).

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCalciumElectric StimulationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFemaleFluorescent DyesHeartIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMyocardiumRabbitsVentricular Function, LeftCalciumFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID18642125
PMCPMC2742888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.